‘The place is suffering’: Enabling dialogue between students’ discourses and academic literacy conventions in engineering

[1]  G. Kress.  Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice , 1985 .

[2]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[5]  J. Herbert Hollomon,et al.  Engineering as a social enterprise , 1992 .

[6]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[7]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse , 1996 .

[8]  Alison Lee,et al.  Engineering as Captive Discourse , 1996 .

[9]  Basil Bernstein,et al.  Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity : theory, research, critique , 1997 .

[10]  Sharon Beder,et al.  Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking , 1999 .

[11]  R. Charon,et al.  Narrative Medicine: Form, Function, and Ethics , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Martyn Evans,et al.  Reflections on the humanities in medical education , 2002, Medical education.

[13]  V. Webb.  Language in South Africa: The role of language in national transformation, reconstruction and development , 2002 .

[14]  Roger Lass,et al.  Language in South Africa: South African English , 2002 .

[15]  Roger Kneebone,et al.  Total internal reflection: an essay on paradigms , 2002, Medical education.

[16]  Arlene Archer.  Access and resistance : challenges of using on-line environments to teach academic discursive practices , 2005 .

[17]  Arlene Archer.  A Multimodal Approach to Academic ‘Literacies’: Problematising the Visual/Verbal Divide , 2006 .