Distortion correction, calibration, and registration: toward an integrated MR and x-ray interventional suite

We present our co-registration results of two complementary imaging modalities, MRI and X-ray angiography (XA), using dual modality fiducial markers. Validation experiments were conducted using a vascular phantom with eight fiducial markers around its periphery. Gradient-distortion-corrected 3D MRI was used to image the phantom and determine the 3D locations of the markers. XA imaging was performed at various C-arm orientations. These images were corrected for geometric distortion, and projection parameters were optimized using a calibration phantom. Closed-form 3D-to-3D rigid-body registration was performed between the MR markers and a 3D reconstruction of the markers from multiple XA images. 3D-to-2D registration was performed using a single XA image by projecting the MR markers onto the XA image and iteratively minimizing the 2D errors between the projected markers and their observed locations in the image. The RMS registration error was 0.77 mm for the 3D-to-3D registration, and 1.53 pixels for the 3D-to-2D registration. We also showed that registration can be performed at a large IS where many markers are visible, then the image can be zoomed in maintaining the registration. This requires calibration of imperfections in the zoom operation of the image intensifier. When we applied the registration used for an IS of 330 mm to an image acquired with an IS of 130 mm, the error was 42.16 pixels before zoom correction and 3.37 pixels after. This method offers the possibility of new therapies where the soft-tissue contrast of MRI and the high-resolution imaging of XA are both needed.

[1]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  Registration and tracking to integrate X-ray and MR images in an XMR Facility , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Eric Cosman Rigid registration of MR and biplanar fluoroscopy , 2000 .

[4]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Cengizhan Ozturk,et al.  Interactive four-dimensional segmentation of multiple image sets , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Elliot R. McVeigh,et al.  Three-dimensional motion tracking of coronary arteries in biplane cineangiograms , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  A Novel Image Similarity Measure for Registration of 3-D MR Images and X-Ray Projection Images , 2002, MICCAI.

[8]  N J Pelc,et al.  A truly hybrid interventional MR/X‐ray system: Feasibility demonstration , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  R Fahrig,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: correction of image intensifier distortion. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  E. Gronenschild,et al.  The accuracy and reproducibility of a global method to correct for geometric image distortion in the x-ray imaging chain. , 1997, Medical physics.

[12]  Tomaz Slivnik,et al.  3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.