Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting functional outcome of stroke.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether a separate comorbidity index is needed to predict functional outcome after stroke, we compared the predictability of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CMI) and the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) to that of a stroke-specific comorbidity index with function quantified with a measure developed with a Rasch model as outcome. DESIGN Two prospective inception cohort studies, in 1996 through 1998 and in 2002 through 2005, with up to 9 months of follow-up. SETTING Participants enrolled in 2 studies were recruited from acute care hospitals in the Montreal area. PARTICIPANTS For study one, 1027 persons with a first stroke discharged into the community were eligible; the 437 who were interviewed a second time at 6 months were included in the analysis. In study two, 235 of 262 patients with stroke were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES To predict recovery, we developed 3 stroke-specific comorbidity algorithms based on the estimated strength of association between comorbidities and stroke function. The various indices were compared on the basis of their predictive ability with a c statistic. RESULTS In study 1, the c statistics were .758, .763, .766, and .763 for the stroke-specific algorithms 1, 2, and 3 and the CMI, respectively. In study 2, the c statistics were .680, .700, .704, .714, and .714 for the algorithms 1, 2, and 3, the CMI, and the FCI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For purposes of case-mix adjustment, the CMI seems to be more than adequate.

[1]  P. Wolf,et al.  Depressive Symptoms and Risk of Stroke: The Framingham Study , 2007, Stroke.

[2]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Body mass index and hospital discharge outcomes after ischemic stroke. , 2007, Archives of neurology.

[3]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[4]  James G Wright,et al.  The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Cherdsak Iramaneerat,et al.  An Introduction to Rasch Measurement , 2008 .

[6]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  N. Mayo,et al.  Does the Addition of Functional Status Indicators to Case-Mix Adjustment Indices Improve Prediction of Hospitalization, Institutionalization, and Death in the Elderly? , 2005, Medical care.

[8]  K. Furie,et al.  Functional Recovery After Rehabilitation for Cerebellar Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[9]  C. Granger,et al.  Trends in length of stay, living setting, functional outcome, and mortality following medical rehabilitation. , 2004, JAMA.

[10]  L. Bouter,et al.  How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  M. Stineman,et al.  Applying quantitative methods to the prediction of full functional recovery in adult rehabilitation patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Prognostic Factors of Activity Limitation and Discharge Destination after Stroke Rehabilitation , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[13]  M Maclure,et al.  Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  P. Duncan,et al.  Prediction of functional outcome after stroke: comparison of the Orpington Prognostic Scale and the NIH Stroke Scale. , 1998, Stroke.

[16]  S. Gabriel,et al.  A comparison of two comorbidity instruments in arthritis. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  David B Matchar,et al.  Charlson Index Comorbidity Adjustment for Ischemic Stroke Outcome Studies , 2004, Stroke.

[18]  N. Mayo,et al.  Development of a measure of functioning for stroke recovery: The functional recovery measure , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  R. Heller,et al.  Accuracy of administrative data to assess comorbidity in patients with heart disease. an Australian perspective. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  N. Black,et al.  Reliability of a comorbidity measure: the Index of Co-Existent Disease (ICED). , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  K. Domen,et al.  Comorbidity measures for stroke outcome research: a preliminary study. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  P. Tonali,et al.  Predictive variables on disability and quality of life in stroke outpatients undergoing rehabilitation , 2006, Neurological Sciences.

[24]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[25]  Lee Bowman,et al.  Refining the categorization of physical functional status: the added value of combining self-reported and performance-based measures. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  J. Guralnik,et al.  Assessing the impact of comorbidity in the older population. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[27]  F. Franchignoni,et al.  The influence of comorbidities and complications on discharge function in stroke rehabilitation inpatients. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[28]  N. Mayo,et al.  Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  Magdalena Mo Ching Mok,et al.  An overview of the family of rasch measurement models , 2004 .

[30]  N. Mayo,et al.  The evolution of stroke in Quebec , 2007, Neurology.

[31]  P. De Wals,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for Use in Long‐Term Care Patients , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[32]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[33]  Salvatore Giaquinto.  Comorbidity in post‐stroke rehabilitation , 2003, European journal of neurology.

[34]  James G Wright,et al.  Assessment of Long-Term Physical Function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients: Comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Functional Comorbidity Index , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  G. Schroth,et al.  Impact of comorbidity on ischemic stroke outcome , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.