A Picture of the Frame: Frame Analysis as Technique and as Politics

In this article, the authors make the case for using frame analysis, an analytical tool commonly used in empirical work on social movements and social policy debates, as a strategy for organizational research. Using two sample texts—representing opposite stands on how the socially responsible investing movement should view investing decisions based on corporate handling of lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgendered workplace issues—they illustrate several important methodological and epistemological concerns for organizational scholars considering this technique. They examine four key issues in particular that arise in thinking about how and why to use frame analysis: (a) using frame analysis to sort out underlying logics; (b) situating frames in context; (c) surfacing politics, subjugated voices, and implicit ideologies; and (d) making mindful choices as organizational researchers. They give special attention to the problem of how our reflexive positions and claims about knowledge have implications for conducting and reading frame analyses.

[1]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[2]  William A. Gamson,et al.  The strategy of social protest , 1975 .

[3]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[4]  R. Brown Bureaucracy as Praxis: Toward a Political Phenomenology of Formal Organizations. , 1978 .

[5]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[6]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy , 1980 .

[7]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice by H. M. Collins (review) , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[9]  M. Alvesson The impact of ideology on organization theory , 1985 .

[10]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Evaluating the welfare state : social and political perspectives , 1985 .

[11]  D. Snow,et al.  Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. , 1986 .

[12]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[13]  K. Luker Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood , 1986 .

[14]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  W. Griswold Provisional, Provincial Positivism: Reply to Denzin , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[17]  C. Ryan,et al.  Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing , 1991 .

[18]  Maureen A. Scully,et al.  The separation of law and justice: Managing impressions of corporate ethics programs , 1993 .

[19]  A. Hirschman A Propensity to Self-Subversion , 1995 .

[20]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory's Neglected Mandate. , 1996 .

[21]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  More Fragmentation? Unfinished Business in Linking the Social Sciences and the Humanities. , 1996 .

[22]  W. Scott,et al.  The Mandate Is Still Being Honored: In Defense of Weber's Disciples , 1996 .

[23]  A. Hoffman,et al.  The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates , 1999 .

[24]  S. Buechler,et al.  Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism , 1999 .

[25]  C. Morrill Institutional Change Through Interstitial Emergence : The Growth of Alternative Dispute Resolution in American Law , 1965-1995 * , 2001 .

[26]  John R. Austin,et al.  Clothes Make the Person? The Tailoring of Legitimating Accounts and the Social Construction of Identity , 2002, Organ. Sci..