Simultaneous use of multiple seismic arrays

Seismic arrays provide an important means of enhancing seismic signals and determining the directional properties of the wavefield by beam- forming. When multiple arrays are to be used together, the viewpoint needs to be modified from looking outwards from each array to focusing on a specific target area and so constraining the portions of the waveforms to be analysed. Beam- forming for each array is supplemented by the relative time constraints for propagation from the target to each array to provide tight spatial control. Simultaneous multiple array analysis provides a powerful tool for source characterisation, and for structural analysis of scatterers as virtual sources. The multiple array concept allows us to illuminate a specific point in the Earth from many different directions and thus map detailed patterns of heterogeneity in the Earth. Furthermore, illumination of the structure from multiple directions using data from the same event minimizes source effects to provide clearer images of heterogeneity. The analysis is based on a similar concept to the back-projection technique, where a part of the seismic wavetrain is mapped to a specific point in space by ray-tracing. In contrast to classic back-projection where the incoming energy is mapped onto a horizontal plane with limited vertical resolution, the multi-array method controls depth response by combining relative time constraints between the arrays and conventional beam-forming. We illustrate this approach with application to two earthquakes at moderate depth. The results show that the use of simultaneous multiple arrays can provide improvement both in signal quality and resolution, with the additional benefit of being able to accurately locate the source of the incoming energy and map large areas with only a limited number of such arrays.

[1]  A. Douglas,et al.  Forensic Seismology and Nuclear Test Bans , 2013 .

[2]  Sarah E. Minson,et al.  The 2011 Magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake: Mosaicking the Megathrust from Seconds to Centuries , 2011, Science.

[3]  Neil D. Selby,et al.  Forensic Seismology and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty , 2009 .

[4]  Steven J. Gibbons,et al.  Improved implementation of the fk and Capon methods for array analysis of seismic noise , 2014 .

[5]  Matthias Ohrnberger,et al.  Rapid characterisation of large earthquakes by multiple seismic broadband arrays , 2010 .

[6]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Three-dimensional empiritraveltimes: construction and applications , 2004 .

[7]  B. Kennett,et al.  Spiral‐Arm Seismic Arrays , 2015 .

[9]  N. Ricker The Form and Laws of Propagation of Seismic Wavelets , 1951 .

[10]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[11]  B. Kennett,et al.  Tracking earthquake source evolution in 3-D , 2014 .

[12]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Energy Release of the 2013 Mw 8.3 Sea of Okhotsk Earthquake and Deep Slab Stress Heterogeneity , 2013, Science.

[13]  M. Ishii,et al.  Combining seismic arrays to image the high‐frequency characteristics of large earthquakes , 2012 .

[14]  Sebastian Rost,et al.  ARRAY SEISMOLOGY: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[15]  Brian L. N. Kennett,et al.  Rapid estimation of relative and absolute delay times across a network by adaptive stacking , 2004 .

[16]  C. Langmuir,et al.  Insights into the Mechanism of Intermediate-Depth Earthquakes from Source Properties as Imaged by Back Projection of Multiple Seismic Phases , 2011 .

[17]  F. Ringdal,et al.  Optimized Seismic Threshold Monitoring – Part 1: Regional Processing , 2002 .

[18]  Martin Schimmel,et al.  Noise reduction and detection of weak, coherent signals through phase-weighted stacks , 1997 .

[19]  B. Kennett,et al.  The Seismic Wavefield: Volume 2, Interpretation of Seismograms on Regional and Global Scales , 2002 .