Two Principles of High-Level Human Visual Processing Potentially Useful for Image and Video Quality Assessment

Objective assessment of image and video quality should be based on a correct understanding of subjective assessment by human observers. Previous models have incorporated the mechanisms of early visual processing in image quality metrics, enabling us to evaluate the visibility of errors from the original images. However, to understand how human observers perceive image quality, one should also consider higher stages of visual processing where perception is established. In higher stages, the visual system presumably represents a visual scene as a collection of meaningful components such as objects and events. Our recent psychophysical studies suggest two principles related to this level of processing. First, the human visual system integrates shape and color signals along perceived motion trajectories in order to improve visibility of the shape and color of moving objects. Second, the human visual system estimates surface reflectance properties like glossiness using simple image statistics rather than by inverse computation of image formation optics. Although the underlying neural mechanisms are still under investigation, these computational principles are potentially useful for the development of effective image processing technologies and for quality assessment. Ideally, if a model can specify how a given image is transformed into high-level scene representations in the human brain, it would predict many aspects of subjective image quality, including fidelity and naturalness.

[1]  Kazuhiko Ukai,et al.  25.2: Distinguished Student Paper: How Color Break‐Up Occurs in the Human Visual System: Mechanism of Color Break‐Up Phenomenon , 2006 .

[2]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[3]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[4]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[8]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[9]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[10]  Bruce Walter,et al.  Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[11]  Junji Watanabe,et al.  Veridical perception of moving colors by trajectory integration of input signals. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[13]  D. Ruderman,et al.  Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  John Ross,et al.  Visual processing of motion , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[16]  Xin Tong,et al.  Video quality evaluation using ST-CIELAB , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Visual detection of motion , 1994 .

[18]  E H Adelson,et al.  Beyond Junctions: Nonlocal form Constraints on Motion Interpretation , 2001, Perception.

[19]  S. Nishida Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  S. Nishida,et al.  Human Visual System Integrates Color Signals along a Motion Trajectory , 2007, Current Biology.