Identifying the Determinants of Light Rail Mode Choice for Medium- and Long-Distance Trips

The introduction of new public transport systems can influence society in a multitude of ways ranging from modal choices and the environment to economic growth. This paper examines the determinants of light rail mode choice for medium- and long-distance trips (10 to 40 km) for a new light rail system in Flanders, Belgium. To investigate these choices, the effects of various transport system–specific factors (i.e., travel cost, in-vehicle travel time, transit punctuality, waiting time, access and egress time, transfers, and availability of seats) as well as the travelers' personal traits were analyzed by using an alternating logistic regression model, which explicitly takes into account the correlated responses for binary data. The data used for the analysis stem from a stated preference survey conducted in Flanders. The modeling results are in line with literature: most transport system–specific factors as well as socioeconomic variables, attitudinal factors, perceptions, and the frequency of using public transport contribute significantly to the preference for light rail transit. In particular, the results indicate that the use of light rail is strongly influenced by travel cost and in-vehicle travel time and to a lesser extent by waiting and access–egress time. Seat availability appeared to play a more important role than did transfers in deciding to choose light rail transit. The findings of this paper can be used by policy makers as a frame of reference to make light rail transit more successful.

[1]  Graham Currie,et al.  Exploring the drivers of light rail ridership: an empirical route level analysis of selected Australian, North American and European systems , 2011 .

[2]  D. Hensher How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .

[3]  Aoife Ahern,et al.  The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices on interurban trips in Ireland , 2008 .

[4]  D A Hensher BUILDING A RESEARCH BASE IN TOURISM: SOME LESSONS AND CHALLENGES IN THE FIELD OF STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL CHOICES , 1993 .

[5]  A. Fujiwara,et al.  Capturing Travelers' Stated Mode Choice Preferences Under Influence of Income in Yangon City, Myanmar , 2008 .

[6]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[7]  K. Frank Impact of a Confounding Variable on a Regression Coefficient , 2000 .

[8]  Kiron Chatterjee,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of bus use in a changing travel environment using panel data , 2011 .

[9]  J. Hough,et al.  An Assessment of Demand for Rural Intercity Transportation Services in a Changing Environment , 2010 .

[10]  M. Kuby,et al.  Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States , 2004 .

[11]  Graham Robert Crampton,et al.  Future of urban transport: learning from success and weakness - light rail , 2002 .

[12]  Martyn Leslie Senior,et al.  Impacts on travel behaviour of Greater Manchester’s light rail investment (Metrolink Phase 1): evidence from household surveys and Census data , 2009 .

[13]  John F. Kain,et al.  Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers , 1999 .

[14]  Roger Mackett,et al.  NEW URBAN RAIL SYSTEMS: A POLICY-BASED TECHNIQUE TO MAKE THEM MORE SUCCESSFUL. , 2003 .

[15]  Stephen B. Billings Estimating the value of a new transit option , 2011 .

[16]  L. Steg CAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT COMPETE WITH THE PRIVATE CAR , 2003 .

[17]  Charles Raux,et al.  Stated adaptation surveys and choice process: Some methodological issues , 1998 .

[18]  Greg Spitz,et al.  Characteristics of premium transit services that affect mode choice , 2011 .

[19]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Travel-time Reliability Impacts on Railway Passenger Demand: A Revealed Preference Analysis , 2011 .

[20]  Matthias Schonlau,et al.  Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey , 2007 .

[21]  C. Macharis,et al.  The impact of "free" public transport: The case of Brussels , 2006 .

[22]  Milena Scherer,et al.  Is Light Rail More Attractive to users than bus Transit?: Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice , 2010 .

[23]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study , 2007 .

[24]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Acceptance of modal innovation: the case of the SwissMetro , 2001 .

[25]  G. Wets,et al.  The Socio-Cognitive Links between Road Pricing Acceptability and Changes in Travel-Behavior , 2011 .

[26]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  Pixels or pencils? The relative effectiveness of Web-based versus paper surveys , 2004 .

[27]  Mark Wardman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR , 1988 .

[28]  Ulrich Weidmann,et al.  Effects of Onboard Ticket Sales on Public Transport Reliability , 2009 .

[29]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Importance of traveler attitudes in the choice of public transportation to work: findings from the Regional Transportation Authority Attitudinal Survey , 2011 .

[30]  R. Mackett,et al.  The impact of new urban public transport systems: will the expectations be met? , 1998 .

[31]  Kari Watkins,et al.  Features that Affect Variability of Travel Time on Bus Rapid Transit Systems , 2010 .

[32]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus , 2002 .

[33]  Robert S. Leiken,et al.  A User’s Guide , 2011 .

[34]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic regression using sas®: theory and application , 1999 .

[35]  Cristian Domarchi,et al.  Effect of attitudes, habit and affective appraisal on mode choice: an application to university workers , 2008 .

[36]  D. Walton,et al.  Attitudes towards public transport in New Zealand , 2010 .