In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee

The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy and computed tomography to accurately determine the three-dimensional, in vivo, weightbearing kinematics of five normal knees. Three-dimensional computer-aided design models of each subject’s femur and tibia were recreated from the three-dimensional computed tomography bone density data. Three-dimensional motions for each subject then were determined for five weightbearing activities. During gait, the lateral condyle experienced −4.3 mm (range, −1.9–−10.3 mm) of average motion, whereas the medial condyle moved only −0.9 mm (range, 3.4–−5.8 mm). One subject experienced 5.8 mm of medial condyle motion. On average, during deep flexion activities, subjects experienced −12.7 mm (range, 1.4–−29.8 mm) of lateral condyle motion, whereas the medial condyle motion only was −2.9 mm (range, 3.0–−9.0 mm). One subject experienced 5.8 and 9.0 mm of medial condyle motion during gait and a deep knee bend, respectively leading to the occurrence of a lateral pivot motion. During the deep flexion activities, the subjects experienced significantly more axial rotation (> 13°) than gait (< 5°). During all five activities, the lateral condyle experienced significantly more anteroposterior translation, leading to axial rotation of the tibia relative to the femur.

[1]  Paul G. J. Maquet Mechanics of the Knee , 1976 .

[2]  K. Markolf,et al.  Stiffness and laxity of the knee--the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  P. Walker,et al.  Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  K. Markolf,et al.  In vitro measurements of knee stability after bicondylar replacement. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The Freeman-Swanson ICLH total knee arthroplasty. Complications and problems. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  E. Chao,et al.  Justification of triaxial goniometer for the measurement of joint rotation. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. Warren,et al.  An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  W. Grana,et al.  The Knee: Form, Function, and Ligament Reconstruction , 1983 .

[9]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Knee motion in total knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the kinematics of the Tricon-M knee prosthesis. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Abnormal kinematics of the artificial knee. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of 10 Miller-Galante and five New Jersey LCS knees. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  T. Andriacchi Functional analysis of pre and post-knee surgery: total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  R. Dittus,et al.  Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  H. Tullos,et al.  Posterior cruciate function following total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  D T Davy,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom transducer for in vitro measurement of patellofemoral contact forces. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Comprehensive gait analysis in posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Knee Kinematics Derived Using an Inverse Perspective Technique , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J B Stiehl,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Stefan M. Gabriel,et al.  Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Anteroposterior Femorotibial Translation of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R Burk,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Appendicular Skeleton , 2003 .

[24]  Johan Kärrholm,et al.  Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: Three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designs , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.