Children's cognitive effort and fluency in writing: Effects of genre and of handwriting automatisation

Abstract This study investigated the cognitive effort of 5th and 9th graders while writing a text. We manipulated genre (narrative text vs. argumentative text) and tested how level of handwriting automatisation contributes to cognitive effort and fluency in writing. The participants were 23 students from Grade 5 and 21 from Grade 9, who wrote two texts differing in genre while performing a secondary reaction time task. The results showed that cognitive effort interacted with genre. Cognitive effort decreased between Grades 5 and 9 only for writing argumentative text. Handwriting did not contribute to fluency in writing, but contributed to cognitive effort only in 5th-graders' writing of narrative text. The findings are discussed in light of the factors contributing to cognitive effort and fluency in writing.

[1]  A Piolat,et al.  SCRIPTKELL: A tool for measuring cognitive effort and time processing in writing and other complex cognitive activities , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[2]  Cheryl M. Yates,et al.  Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing , 1992 .

[3]  Annie Piolat,et al.  Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes ? La méthode de la triple tâche : un bilan méthodologique , 2000 .

[4]  D. McCutchen.  Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing , 2000 .

[5]  V. Berninger,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF FINGER FUNCTION TO BEGINNING WRITING: APPLICATION TO DIAGNOSIS OF WRITING DISABILITIES , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  D. McCutchen.  A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition , 1996 .

[7]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  The Science of Writing : Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications , 1996 .

[8]  São Luís Castro,et al.  Execution and pauses in writing narratives: processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill. , 2008, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[9]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[10]  P. Coirier,et al.  Foundations of argumentative text processing , 2000 .

[11]  M. Scardamalia.  Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition , 1987 .

[12]  M. Fayol,et al.  Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production , 2002 .

[13]  Laura B. Smolkin,et al.  The Contexts of Comprehension: The Information Book Read Aloud, Comprehension Acquisition, and Comprehension Instruction in a First-Grade Classroom , 2001, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  Bruce Saddler,et al.  How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? A national survey , 2008 .

[15]  Linda Allal,et al.  Integrated Writing Instruction and the Development of Revision Skills , 2004 .

[16]  Ian Nimmo-Smith,et al.  DEVELOPING EFFICIENCY IN CURSIVE HANDWRITING: AN ANALYSIS OF ‘t’ CROSSING BEHAVIOUR IN CHILDREN , 1989 .

[17]  Carol A. Christensen,et al.  Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text , 1999 .

[18]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Advances in psycholinguistics , 1970 .

[19]  S. Graham,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development , 2000 .

[20]  Thierry Olive,et al.  Working Memory in Writing: Empirical Evidence From the Dual-Task Technique , 2004 .

[21]  Lucile Chanquoy,et al.  Revision : cognitive and instructional processes , 2004 .

[22]  Barbara Couture.  Functional approaches to writing : research perspectives , 1986 .

[23]  Thierry Olive,et al.  The Triple Task Technique for Studying the Process of Writing , 2002 .

[24]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Computer recognition and human production of handwriting , 1989 .

[25]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Competition for working memory among writing processes. , 2001, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[27]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades , 1994 .

[28]  M. Favart.  Les marques de cohésion : leur rôle fonctionnel dans l'acquisition de la production écrite de texte , 2005 .

[29]  M. Fayol,et al.  Is Written Language Production more Difficult than Oral Language Production? A Working Memory Approach , 1994 .

[30]  R. Abbott,et al.  Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. , 1997 .

[31]  R. T. Kellogg.  A model of working memory in writing. , 1996 .

[32]  Laura B. Smolkin,et al.  Children's Understanding of Genre and Writing Development. , 2006 .

[33]  E. Clark.  Explorations in the functions of language. , 1978 .

[34]  Julie E. Dockrell,et al.  The slow handwriting of undergraduate students constrains overall performance in exam essays , 2005 .

[35]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Stephen T. Peverly,et al.  The Importance of Handwriting Speed in Adult Writing , 2006, Developmental neuropsychology.

[37]  M. Favart,et al.  Acquisition of relations between the conceptual and linguistic dimensions of linearization in descriptive text composition in grades five to nine: a comparison with oral production. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[38]  L. Chanquoy,et al.  Les marques de cohésion comme outils privilégiés de la textualisation : une comparaison entre élèves de CM2 et adultes experts , 2007 .

[39]  R. T. Kellogg.  The Psychology of Writing , 1994 .

[40]  Linda Flower,et al.  Planning in Writing: The Cognition of a Constructive Process. Technical Report No. 34. , 1989 .

[41]  D. McCutchen,et al.  “Functional Automaticity” in Children's Writing , 1988 .

[42]  S. Graham,et al.  A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994 , 1996 .

[43]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[44]  John R. Hayes,et al.  Planning in writing: The cogniton of a constructive process , 1992 .

[45]  Pierre Coirier,et al.  Acquisition of the Linearization Process in Text Composition in Third to Ninth Graders: Effects of Textual Superstructure and Macrostructural Organization , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  George Kamberelis,et al.  Genre Development and Learning: Children Writing Stories, Science Reports, and Poems , 1999, Research in the Teaching of English.

[47]  R. Abbott,et al.  Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers , 1996 .

[48]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Young Writers' Use of Text Structure in Expository Text Generation , 1988 .

[49]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing , 2002 .

[50]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .

[51]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Coordinating Transcription and Text Generation in Working Memory during Composing: Automatic and Constructive Processes , 1999 .

[52]  R. Siegler.  Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[53]  Carol A. Donovan.  Children’s Development and Control of Written Story and Informational Genres: Insights from One Elementary School , 2001, Research in the Teaching of English.

[54]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[55]  Annie Vinter,et al.  The impact of spatio-temporal constraints on cursive letter handwriting in children , 2008 .