The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda

Abstract The compulsory use of IFRS for the consolidated statements of listed companies in the EU and elsewhere, and the convergence of IFRS with US GAAP, might imply the end of ‘international accounting’ as an important field of study. However, there are motives and opportunities for international differences of practice to exist within IFRS usage. Some of the original motives for international accounting differences may still be effective in an IFRS context, though in different ways. The opportunities for different IFRS practices are divided into eight types. Hypotheses relating to each of these are proposed, and some ways of testing them are suggested. Some implications of the existence of different national versions of IFRS are noted.

[1]  T. Doupnik,et al.  The Impact of Culture on the Interpretation of “In Context” Verbal Probability Expressions , 2004 .

[2]  C. Nobes.  Asset Measurement Bases in UK and IASC Standards , 2001 .

[3]  F. Fukuyama.  The End of History? , 1989, The New Social Theory Reader.

[4]  A. Haller.  The Relationship of Financial and Tax Accounting in Germany: A Major Reason for Disharmony in Europe , 1992 .

[5]  P. Feige.  How uniform is financial reporting in Germany? The example of foreign currency translation , 1997 .

[6]  K. Schipper.  The introduction of International Accounting Standards in Europe: Implications for international convergence , 2005 .

[7]  木下 照岳.  The Impact of Culture on Accounting , 1990 .

[8]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings , 1999 .

[9]  Stephen A. Zeff,et al.  “Political” Lobbying on Proposed Standards: A Challenge to the IASB , 2002 .

[10]  C. Nobes.  On accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate , 2004 .

[11]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  Principles‐Based Accounting Standards , 2003 .

[12]  Colin Mayer,et al.  Ownership and Control of German Corporations , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions , 2005 .

[14]  G. Whittington.  The adoption of International Accounting Standards in the European Union , 2005 .

[15]  S. Gray.  Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally , 1988 .

[16]  Ole-Kristian Hope,et al.  Disclosure Practices, Enforcement of Accounting Standards and Analysts' Forecast Accuracy: An International Study , 2003 .

[17]  S. Bryant,et al.  Disclosure Level and Compliance with IASs: A Comparison of Companies With and Without U.S. Listings and Filings , 2000 .

[18]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Legal Determinants of External Finance , 1997 .

[19]  Emilio S. Binavince,et al.  Major legal systems in the world today , 1968 .

[20]  Roger J. Willett,et al.  Cultural Relevance of Western Accounting Systems to Developing Countries , 1995 .

[21]  H. Hatfield.  Some Variations in Accounting Practice in England, France, Germany and the United States , 1966 .

[22]  Bikki Jaggi,et al.  Impact of Culture, Market Forces, and Legal System on Financial Disclosures , 2000 .

[23]  John Zysman,et al.  Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. , 1985 .

[24]  C. Nobes.  On the myth of “Anglo-Saxon” financial accounting: a comment , 2003 .

[25]  P. Weetman,et al.  Political Influence and Coexistence of a Uniform Accounting System and Accounting Standards: Recent Developments in China , 2004 .

[26]  J. Flower.  The future shape of harmonization: a reply , 1998 .

[27]  P. Brown,et al.  A commentary on issues relating to the enforcement of International Financial Reporting Standards in the EU , 2005 .

[28]  C. Nobes,et al.  How uniform is financial reporting in Germany?: some replies , 1997 .

[29]  K. V. Hulle.  From Accounting Directives to International Accounting Standards , 2004 .

[30]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Law and Finance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Christopher Nobes,et al.  A JUDGEMENTAL INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES , 1983 .

[32]  Erik Skaden.  Disclosure Practices, Enforcement of Accounting Standards, and Analysts' Forecast Accuracy: An International Study , 2003 .

[33]  Barbara E. Weißenberger,et al.  Changing from German GAAP to IFRS or US GAAP: A Survey of German Companies , 2004 .

[34]  Timothy S. Doupnik,et al.  An Empirical test of a Judgemental International Classification of Financial Reporting Practices , 1993 .

[35]  A. Haller,et al.  The Adaptation of German Accounting Rules to IFRS: A Legislative Balancing Act , 2004 .

[36]  A. d'Arcy,et al.  Accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate — an empirical investigation , 2001 .

[37]  R. D. Nair,et al.  The impact of disclosure and measurement practices on international accounting classifications**This article is reprinted, with permission, from The Accounting Review (July, 1980) pp 426–450 , 1983 .

[38]  C. Nobes.  The future shape of harmonization: some responses , 1998 .

[39]  Erlend Kvaal.  Topics in accounting for impairment of fixed assets , 2005 .

[40]  C. Nobes,et al.  International Variations in the Connections Between Tax and Financial Reporting , 1998 .

[41]  C. Nobes.  Towards a General Model of the Reasons for International Differences in Financial Reporting , 1998 .

[42]  D. Alexander,et al.  On the Myth of "Anglo-Saxon" Financial Accounting , 2000 .

[43]  C. Nobes.  Rules‐Based Standards and the Lack of Principles in Accounting , 2005 .

[44]  Sylwia Gornik-Tomaszewski,et al.  Implications of the ‘IAS Regulation’ for Research into the International Differences in Accounting Systems , 2006 .

[45]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose.  AUDIT FEES AND AUDITOR SIZE - FURTHER EVIDENCE , 1986 .