Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans

Purpose: Commercial internet-based companies offer genome-wide scans to predict the risk of common diseases and personalize nutrition and lifestyle recommendations. These risk estimates are updated with every new gene discovery.Methods: To assess the benefits of updating risk information in commercial genome-wide scans, we compared type 2 diabetes risk predictions based on TCF7L2 alone, 18 polymorphisms alone, and 18 polymorphisms plus age, sex, and body mass index. Analyses were performed using data from the Rotterdam study, a prospective, population-based study among individuals aged 55 years and older. Data were available from 5297 participants.Results: The actual prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the study population was 20%. Predicted risks were below average for carriers of the TCF7L2 CC genotype (predicted risk 17.6%) and above average for the CT and TT genotypes (20.8% and 28.0%). Adding the other 17 polymorphisms caused 34% of participants to be reclassified (i.e., switched between below and above average): 24% of the CC carriers changed to increased risk, 52% and 6% of the CT and TT carriers changed to decreased risk. Including information on age, sex, and body mass index caused 29% to change categories (27%, 31%, and 19% for CC, CT, and TT carriers, respectively). In total, 39% of participants changed categories once when risk factors were updated, and 11% changed twice, i.e., back to their initial risk category.Conclusion: Updating risk factors may produce contradictory information about an individual's risk status over time, which is undesirable if lifestyle and nutritional recommendations vary accordingly.

[1]  A. Brand,et al.  The impact of genetics and genomics on public health , 2008, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[2]  C. Dina,et al.  Impact of Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms in the DESIR Prospective Study , 2008, Diabetes.

[3]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Finns Detects Multiple Susceptibility Variants , 2007, Science.

[4]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[5]  T. Hudson,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature.

[6]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Will genetics revolutionize medicine? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Marcia M. Nizzari,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels , 2007, Science.

[8]  A. Cecile J. W. Janssens Is the time right for translation research in genomics? , 2008, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[9]  A. Hinman,et al.  Newborn dried bloodspot screening: mapping the clinical and public health components and activities , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[10]  Peter Almgren,et al.  Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Cornelia M van Duijn,et al.  Genome-based prediction of common diseases: advances and prospects. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[12]  Francis S Collins,et al.  Realizing the promise of genomics in biomedical research. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Predictive genetic testing for type 2 diabetes , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  K. Offit Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? , 2008, JAMA.

[15]  Francis S Collins,et al.  A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Roter,et al.  The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL‐G): A means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[18]  A. F. Scott,et al.  OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man , 2002 .

[19]  P. Raskin,et al.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[20]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Science.

[21]  Brenda Wilson,et al.  A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[22]  Monique M. B. Breteler,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[23]  B. Kuehn Risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer genetic testing remain unclear. , 2008, JAMA.

[24]  Mark I. McCarthy,et al.  Assessing the Combined Impact of 18 Common Genetic Variants of Modest Effect Sizes on Type 2 Diabetes Risk , 2008, Diabetes.

[25]  A. Hofman,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: objectives and design update , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[26]  N. Cook Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction , 2007, Circulation.

[27]  F. Collins,et al.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. , 2001, JAMA.

[28]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[29]  Paul G Shekelle,et al.  Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. , 2008, JAMA.

[30]  P. Vineis,et al.  Misconceptions about the use of genetic tests in populations , 2001, The Lancet.

[31]  Nancy R. Cook,et al.  Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction , 2007, Circulation.

[32]  F. Collins,et al.  A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.

[33]  Yingye Zheng,et al.  Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  Robert C Green,et al.  Genetic Risk Assessment for Adult Children of People With Alzheimer’s Disease: The Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer’s Disease (REVEAL) Study , 2005, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[35]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[36]  A. Cecile J.W. Janssens,et al.  Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Based on Polymorphisms From Genome-Wide Association Studies , 2008, Diabetes.

[37]  Ronald P. Stolk,et al.  Universal risk factors for multifactorial diseases-LifeLines : a three-generation population-based study , 2008 .