Technological relatedness and regional branching

The relatedness between the technologies used among firms in a region is thought to affect the nature and scope of knowledge spillovers. In this paper, we set out how the concepts of technological relatedness and related variety have enriched recent literature in economic geography. First, applying the notion of related variety has led to new insights in the externalities literature. There is increasing evidence that regions with different but technologically related activities (related variety) benefit more from spillovers. Second, the technological relatedness concept has provided additional insights to the question whether extra-regional linkages matter for regional growth: it is not inflows of extra-regional knowledge per se, but inflows of knowledge that are related to the existing knowledge base of regions that might be crucial. Third, the concept of relatedness has found its way in network analysis. There is evidence that collaborative research projects tend to create more new knowledge when they consist of agents that bring in related competences. Linking network dynamics to the industry life-cycle approach, one expects that cognitive proximity levels between cluster firms will increase over time, with detrimental effects on their performance levels. Fourth, the cluster literature often regards labor mobility as a key mechanism through which knowledge diffuses, but no attention has been paid to relatedness until recently. And fifth, studies demonstrate that countries and regions tend to expand into sectors that are closely related to their existing activities. To the extent that new industries emerge from related industries, the sectoral composition of a regional economy affects the diversification opportunities of regions in the long run. This process of sectoral branching occurs primarily at the regional level, because it becomes manifest through a number of knowledge transfer mechanisms (i.e. spinoff activity, firm diversification, labor mobility and networking) that tend to be geographically bounded.

[1]  E. Dahmen,et al.  ‘Development Blocks’ in Industrial Economics , 1988 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  Jürgen Essletzbichler,et al.  Diversity, stability and regional growth in the United States, 1975-2002 , 2007 .

[4]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations , 2007, Science.

[5]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context , 2001 .

[6]  Robert Hassink,et al.  How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster , 2005 .

[7]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Technological Extinctions of Industrial Firms: An Inquiry into Their Nature and Causes , 1997 .

[8]  H. Overman.  Innovation in cities , 2011 .

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[10]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .

[11]  Tobias Kronenberg,et al.  General purpose technologies and energy policy , 2005 .

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[14]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Evolution, Process Variety, and Regional Trajectories of Technological Change in U.S. Manufacturing , 1997 .

[15]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[16]  John H. Barnhill,et al.  THE UNBOUND PROMETHEUS: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present , 2004 .

[17]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Bright and Dark Side of Cooperation for Regional Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[18]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[20]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[21]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Disagreements, Spinoffs, and the Evolution of Detroit as the Capital of the U.S. Automobile Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[23]  A. T. Wal.  The Spatial Dynamics of the Inventor Network in German Biotechnology : Geographical Proximity Versus Triadic Closure , 2009 .

[24]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[25]  D. Rigby,et al.  Competition, variety and the geography of technology evolution , 2005 .

[26]  Ricardo Hausmann,et al.  The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage , 2007 .

[27]  R. Boschma,et al.  A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process , 2007 .

[28]  Max-Peter Menzel,et al.  Cluster Life Cycles , 2022 .

[29]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 04 The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry , 2005 .

[30]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Industry Boundaries: Human Expertise, Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups , 1994 .

[31]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  A General Inter-Industry Relatedness Index , 2006 .

[32]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[33]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification , 2000 .

[34]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[35]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[36]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[37]  Daniel F. Heuermann.  Reinventing the Skilled Region: Human Capital Externalities and Industrial Change , 2009 .

[38]  J. Essletzbichler.  Diversity, stability and regional growth in the U.S. (1975-2002) , 2005 .

[39]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[40]  Frank Neffke,et al.  Revealed Relatedness: Mapping Industry Space , 2008 .