Familiarity Breeds Attraction: Effects of Exposure on the Attractiveness of Typical and Distinctive Faces

Several studies have shown that facial attractiveness is positively correlated with both familiarity and typicality. Here we manipulated the familiarity of typical and distinctive faces to measure the effect on attractiveness. In our first experiment, we collected ratings of attractiveness, distinctiveness, and familiarity using three different groups of participants. Our stimuli included 84 images of female faces, presented in a full-face view. We replicated the finding that attractiveness ratings negatively correlate with distinctiveness ratings. In addition, we showed that attractiveness ratings were positively correlated with familiarity ratings. In our second experiment, we demonstrated that increasing exposure to faces increases their attractiveness, although there was no differential effect of exposure on typical and distinctive faces. Our results suggest that episodic familiarity affects attractiveness ratings independently of general or structural familiarity. The implications of our findings for the ‘face-space’ model are discussed.

[1]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[2]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[3]  M. Strauss,et al.  Abstraction of prototypical information by adults and 10-month-old infants. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  Leah L. Light,et al.  Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember , 1981 .

[5]  E. R. Siqueland,et al.  The nature and structure of infant form categories , 1983 .

[6]  Paul C. Quinn,et al.  On Categorization in Early Infancy. , 1986 .

[7]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[8]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[9]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[10]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[12]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[13]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[14]  E. Otta,et al.  Reading a Smiling Face: Messages Conveyed by Various Forms of Smiling , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness , 1996 .

[16]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[17]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The Attractiveness of Nonface Averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[18]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Rhodes,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF MERE EXPOSURE EFFECTS TO AVERAGED COMPOSITE FACES , 2001 .

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The Attractiveness of Average Faces: Cross-Cultural Evidence and Possible Biological Basis , 2002 .

[21]  Averages and extremes in face perception , 2002 .

[22]  G. Rhodes,et al.  It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.