The Effect of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test on Radiation Risk Estimate for Prostate Cancer Incidence among Atomic-Bomb Survivors

Following our previous report on the radiation dose-response for prostate cancer incidence rates in the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of atomic bomb survivors, we reevaluated the radiation-related risk adjusting for differences in baseline cancer incidence rates among three subsets of the LSS cohort defined by the timing of their first participation in biennial health examinations offered to the Adult Health Study (AHS) sub-cohort members and prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) testing status for AHS participants: 1. non-AHS participants, 2. AHS participants before receiving PSA test, and 3. AHS participants after receiving PSA test. We found a 2.9-fold increase in the baseline incidence rates among AHS participants after receiving PSA test. After adjusting for the PSA-testing-status effects on the baseline rates the estimated excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.15, 1.05), which was almost identical to the previously reported unadjusted ERR estimate (0.57, 95% CI: 0.21, 1.00). The current results confirmed that, while the PSA testing among AHS participants increased the baseline incidence rates, it did not impact the radiation risk estimate, strengthening the previously reported dose-response relationship for prostate cancer incidence in the LSS. As the use of PSA tests continue in screening and medical settings, analyses of possible effects of PSA testing should be an important aspect of future epidemiological studies of the association between radiation exposure and prostate cancer.

[1]  K. Katanoda,et al.  Updated Trends in Cancer in Japan: Incidence in 1985–2015 and Mortality in 1958–2018—A Sign of Decrease in Cancer Incidence , 2021, Journal of epidemiology.

[2]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Risk of Prostate Cancer Incidence among Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–2009 , 2020, Radiation Research.

[3]  K. Katanoda,et al.  Long-term Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence by Stage at Diagnosis in Japan Using the Multiple Imputation Approach, 1993–2014 , 2020, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  A. Hida,et al.  Epidemiological studies of atomic bomb radiation at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation , 2019, International journal of radiation biology.

[5]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Cancer mortality and incidence following external occupational radiation exposure: an update of the 3rd analysis of the UK national registry for radiation workers , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  D. Preston,et al.  Selection of reference groups in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors , 2017, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[7]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–2009 , 2017, Radiation Research.

[8]  D. Preston,et al.  Radiation Effects on Mortality from Solid Cancers Other than Lung, Liver, and Bone Cancer in the Mayak Worker Cohort: 1948–2008 , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Y. Kitagawa,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen-based population screening for prostate cancer: current status in Japan and future perspective in Asia , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[10]  H. Kondo,et al.  Effects of radiation on the incidence of prostate cancer among Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors , 2013, Cancer science.

[11]  J. Harrison,et al.  Solid cancer incidence other than lung, liver and bone in Mayak workers: 1948–2004 , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors.Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950–1990 , 2012, Radiation research.

[13]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Prostate cancer mortality risk in relation to working underground in the Wismut cohort study of German uranium miners, 1970–2003 , 2012, BMJ Open.

[14]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases , 2012, Radiation research.

[15]  G. Howe,et al.  Mortality (1950–1999) and Cancer Incidence (1969–1999) in the Cohort of Eldorado Uranium Workers , 2010, Radiation research.

[16]  C. Hamashima,et al.  The Japanese guideline for prostate cancer screening. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  S. Naito,et al.  Japanese Urological Association guidelines on prostate‐specific antigen‐based screening for prostate cancer and the ongoing cluster cohort study in Japan , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[18]  B Carstensen,et al.  Age–period–cohort models for the Lexis diagram , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[20]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  N. Weiss Adjusting for screening history in epidemiologic studies of cancer: why, when, and how to do it. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  R. Doll,et al.  Cancer mortality following X‐ray treatment for ankylosing spondylitis , 1994, International journal of cancer.

[23]  V. Beral,et al.  Case-control study of prostatic cancer in employees of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. , 1993, BMJ.

[24]  D. Pierce,et al.  Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivor data. , 1990, Radiation research.

[25]  D. Richardson,et al.  Site-specific Solid Cancer Mortality After Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Cohort Study of Workers (INWORKS) , 2018, Epidemiology.

[26]  K. Kodama,et al.  DS02R1: Improvements to Atomic Bomb Survivors’ Input Data and Implementation of Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02) and Resulting Changes in Estimated Doses , 2017, Health physics.

[27]  L. Fagerlund,et al.  The United Nations , 1993 .