An inter-comparison exercise of Sentinel-2 radiometric validations assessed by independent expert groups

Abstract Copernicus is the European Union's Earth Observation and Monitoring programme, delivering free access to operational and historical environmental data to support applications in a wide range of societal benefit areas. To allow meaningful long-term environmental monitoring and robust decision-making, it is essential to ensure that satellite-retrieved products are of high quality and consistency. This paper describes the outputs of an international workshop on the radiometric calibration validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B Multi-Spectral Instrument. A wide range of vicarious methodologies have been applied independently and then compared per type of target. All methods agree on the good radiometric performance of both Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B with respect to the mission requirements as well as on evidence of a slight bias between the two instruments. Comparisons of all these results are discussed to highlight the benefits and advantages of the methods as well as to propose potential improvements either for the methods themselves and/or for the comparison exercise.

[1]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  Implication of spatial uniformity on vicarious calibration using automated test sites , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[2]  Ping Yang,et al.  Application of deep convective cloud albedo observation to satellite-based study of the terrestrial atmosphere: monitoring the stability of spaceborne measurements and assessing absorption anomaly , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Bertrand Fougnie,et al.  Monitoring of Radiometric Sensitivity Changes of Space Sensors Using Deep Convective Clouds: Operational Application to PARASOL , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  S. Maritorena,et al.  Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: A reappraisal , 2001 .

[5]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat-8 OLI radiometric cross comparison over desert sites , 2018 .

[6]  Amit Angal,et al.  Absolute Calibration of Optical Satellite Sensors Using Libya 4 Pseudo Invariant Calibration Site , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Bertrand Fougnie,et al.  Sentinel-2A and 2B absolute calibration monitoring , 2019, European Journal of Remote Sensing.

[8]  Hui Feng,et al.  AERONET-OC: A Network for the Validation of Ocean Color Primary Products , 2009 .

[9]  M. Bouvet.  Radiometric comparison of multispectral imagers over a pseudo-invariant calibration site using a reference radiometric model , 2014 .

[10]  John L. Barker,et al.  Impacts of spectral band difference effects on radiometric cross-calibration between satellite sensors in the solar-reflective spectral domain , 2007 .

[11]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[12]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  Temporal, spectral, and spatial study of the automated vicarious calibration test site at Railroad Valley, Nevada , 2008, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  E. Vermote,et al.  Absolute calibration of AVHRR visible and near-infrared channels using ocean and cloud views , 1995 .

[14]  Nathan Leisso,et al.  Design and calibration of field deployable ground-viewing radiometers. , 2013, Applied optics.

[15]  Amit Angal,et al.  Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Nipa Phojanamongkolkij,et al.  Achieving Climate Change Absolute Accuracy in Orbit , 2013 .

[17]  B. Markham,et al.  Forty-year calibrated record of earth-reflected radiance from Landsat: A review , 2012 .

[18]  S. Kratzer,et al.  Satellite-based water quality monitoring in Lake Vänern, Sweden , 2016 .

[19]  James A. Gardner,et al.  MODTRAN5: a reformulated atmospheric band model with auxiliary species and practical multiple scattering options , 2004, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[20]  O. Hagolle,et al.  Relative and multitemporal calibration of AVHRR, SeaWiFS, and VEGETATION using POLDER characterization of desert sites , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[21]  E. Vermote,et al.  In-flight calibration of large field of view sensors at short wavelengths using Rayleigh scattering , 1992 .

[22]  Jeffrey S. Czapla-Myers,et al.  Ground viewing radiometer characterization, implementation and calibration applications: a summary after two years of field deployment , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[23]  Samuel E. Hunt,et al.  Providing uncertainty estimates of the Sentinel-2 top-of-atmosphere measurements for radiometric validation activities , 2018 .

[24]  Bertrand Fougnie,et al.  Climatology of oceanic zones suitable for in-flight calibration of space sensors , 2010, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[25]  Jérôme M. B. Louis,et al.  Copernicus Sentinel-2A Calibration and Products Validation Status , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Xavier Briottet,et al.  Results of POLDER in-flight calibration , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  F. Gascon,et al.  Sentinel-2 L1C radiometric validation using deep convective clouds observations , 2018 .

[28]  Bertrand Fougnie,et al.  Cross Calibration Over Desert Sites: Description, Methodology, and Operational Implementation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  N. Gobron,et al.  A semidiscrete model for the scattering of light by vegetation , 1997 .

[30]  Larry Leigh,et al.  The Ground-Based Absolute Radiometric Calibration of Landsat 8 OLI , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[31]  K. Thome.  Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat 7 ETM+ using the reflectance-based method , 2001 .