Semantic context effects and priming in word association

Two experiments investigated priming in word association, an implicit memory task. In the study phase of Experiment 1, semantically ambiguous target words were presented in sentences that biased their interpretation. The appropriate interpretation of the target was either congruent or incongruent with the cue presented in a subsequent word association task. Priming (i.e., a higher proportion of target responses relative to a nonstudied baseline) was obtained for the congruent condition, but not for the incongruent condition. In Experiment 2, study sentences emphasized particular meaning aspects of nonambiguous targets. The word association task showed a higher proportion of target responses for targets studied in the more congruent sentence context than for targets studied in the less congruent sentence context. These results indicate that priming in word association depends largely on the storage of information relating the cue and target.

[1]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual memory processes in global amnesia. , 1995 .

[2]  H. Roediger,et al.  Semantic specificity in cued recall , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  FAILURE TO FIND THE PICTURE SUPERIORITY EFFECT IN IMPLICIT CONCEPTUAL MEMORY TESTS , 1996 .

[4]  P. Guyer,et al.  The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[5]  L. Light,et al.  Effects of Changed Semantic Context on Recognition Memory , 1970 .

[6]  L R Squire,et al.  Paired-associate learning and priming effects in amnesia: a neuropsychological study. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  P. Dixon,et al.  University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[10]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[11]  L. Barsalou Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[12]  J. Shelton,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  M. Stone,et al.  Attention and conceptual priming : Limits on the effects of divided attention in the category-exemplar production task , 1999 .

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  S. Hashtroudi,et al.  Does organization improve priming? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: A comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  N. Mulligan The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory , 2002 .

[18]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Priming effects in semantic classification tasks. , 1995 .

[19]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. , 1998 .

[20]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[21]  D. Gorfein On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .

[22]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[23]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  The origins of levels-of-processing effects in a conceptual test: Evidence for automatic influences of memory from the process-dissociation procedure , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[24]  T. Blaxton Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[25]  D. Nelson,et al.  Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[26]  A. Bubka,et al.  The selection of homograph meaning: Word association when context changes , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Recollective and automatic uses of memory. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[29]  Michael S. Humphreys,et al.  Target similarity effects: Support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[30]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[32]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[33]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  N. Mulligan,et al.  The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.