The Impact of the Core Knowledge Curriculum on Creativity

The Core Knowledge Sequence, which has been proposed as a voluntary national curriculum and has been adopted in many school districts across the United States, is unusually specific about the con- tent students are expected to learn at each grade level. This has led to suggestions that it may promote rote learning and result in a decline in creativity. This pos- sibility was investigated by comparing the creative performance of middle school students who had been attending Core Knowledge schools to that of students at a matched non-Core Knowledge school. There were 3 comparisons: poems written by seventh-grade stu- dents, short stories written by seventh-grade students, and short stories written by eighth-grade students. Experts evaluated the creativity of these stories and poems using a consensual assessment technique. Only 1 of the 3 comparisons yielded a statistically signifi- cant difference, and that difference favored Core Knowledge students. These results suggest that the Core Knowledge Curriculum and its detailed and spe- cific requirements of content to be studied at each grade level do not negatively impact students' creativ- ity and may even have a positive impact on creative performance in some areas.

[1]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Greatness: Who Makes History and Why , 1994 .

[2]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[3]  R. Paul,et al.  Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs To Survive in a Changing World , 1991 .

[4]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[5]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[6]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[7]  D. Harrington-Lueker The Year's Best Books. , 1997 .

[8]  Gail Owen Schubnell Hawthorne Elementary School: The Evaluator's Perspective. , 1996 .

[9]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[10]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Critical creative processes , 2003 .

[11]  John Baer,et al.  Generality of creativity across performance domains , 1991 .

[12]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  Darwin and Facial Expression: A Century of Research in Review.@@@Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. , 1974 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[14]  Kathleen Vail Core Comes to Crooksville. , 1997 .

[15]  R. Mayer Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[16]  C. Bynum The Presence of Objects: Medieval Anti-Judaism in Modern Germany , 2003 .

[17]  E. Hirsch,et al.  The Schools We Need: And Why We Don't Have Them , 1996 .

[18]  John Baer The Effects of Task‐Specific Divergent‐Thinking Training , 1996 .

[19]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  The analysis of intelligence , 1971 .