The dynamics of rhythmical aiming in 2D task space: relation between geometry and kinematics under examination.

We explored a two-dimensional task space variant of the classical rhythmical Fitts' task in which participants were asked to sequentially cross four targets arranged around the extreme points of the major axes of an ellipse. Fitts' law was found to adequately describe the changes in movement time with the variations in task difficulty (ID), but the 1/3 power-law relating curvature and tangential velocity of the trajectory did not resist the increase in ID. Kinematic analyses showed that the behavioral adaptation to the ID resulted in an increase in the contribution of non-linear terms to the kinematics along the two axes of task space. Moreover, a limit cycle model (combining Rayleigh damping and Duffing stiffness, as in one-dimensional Fitts' task) captured such a behavior. In such a context, Fitts' law and the 1/3 power law appear as surface relations that emerge from parametric changes in a dynamical structure that captures the nature of Fitts' task.

[1]  Denis Mottet,et al.  The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Y. Guiard.  On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[3]  M. Turvey,et al.  Chaos in Human Rhythmic Movement. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Direct cortical representation of drawing. , 1994, Science.

[5]  P. Viviani,et al.  A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[7]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[8]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[9]  P. Viviani,et al.  Trajectory determines movement dynamics , 1982, Neuroscience.

[10]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  J. J. Buchanan,et al.  Self-organization of trajectory formation , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  A. Wing,et al.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Tools for constructing dynamical models of rhythmic movement , 1988 .

[15]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Self-organization of trajectory formation , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. , 1995 .

[17]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Time, Size and Shape in Handwriting: Exploring Spatio-temporal Relationships at Different Levels , 1985 .

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.