The role of nucleus accumbens shell in learning about neutral versus excitatory stimuli during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

We studied the role of nucleus accumbens shell (AcbSh) in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Rats were trained to fear conditioned stimulus A (CSA) in Stage I, which was then presented in compound with a neutral stimulus and paired with shock in Stage II. AcbSh lesions had no effect on fear-learning to CSA in Stage I, but selectively prevented learning about the neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) in Stage II. These results add to a growing body of evidence indicating an important role for the ventral striatum in fear-learning. They suggest that the ventral striatum and AcbSh, in particular, directs learning toward or away from a CS as a consequence of how well that CS predicts the shock unconditioned stimulus (US). AcbSh is required to reduce the processing of established predictors, thereby permitting neutral or less predictive stimuli to be learned about.

[1]  G. Hall,et al.  Nucleus accumbens lesions impair context, but not cue, conditioning in rats , 1997, Neuroreport.

[2]  Unblocking in Pavlovian fear conditioning. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  Andrew M. Poulos,et al.  The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  R F Westbrook,et al.  Microinjection of morphine into the nucleus accumbens impairs contextual learning in rats. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Jeffrey C. Cooper,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[6]  I. Weiner,et al.  Latent inhibition is disrupted by nucleus accumbens shell lesion but is abnormally persistent following entire nucleus accumbens lesion: The neural site controlling the expression and disruption of the stimulus preexposure effect , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  J. Pearce,et al.  Hippocampal Lesions Attenuate Latent Inhibition and the Decline of the Orienting Response in Rats , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  M. Witter,et al.  Organization of the projections from the subiculum to the ventral striatum in the rat. A study using anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin , 1987, Neuroscience.

[9]  Trevor W. Robbins,et al.  Selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell differentially affect aversive Pavlovian conditioning to discrete and contextual cues , 1999, Psychobiology.

[10]  Michael Davis,et al.  The Nucleus Accumbens is not Critically Involved in Mediating the Effects of a Safety Signal on Behavior , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Limbic-motor integration , 1987 .

[12]  Peter W. Kalivas,et al.  Selective activation of dopamine transmission in the shell of the nucleus accumbens by stress , 1995, Brain Research.

[13]  R. Wise.  Role of brain dopamine in food reward and reinforcement , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  I. Weiner,et al.  Disrupted and Undisruptable Latent Inhibition following Shell and Core Lesions , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. Rescorla.  Unequal Associative Changes when Excitors and Neutral Stimuli are Conditioned in Compound , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Deutch,et al.  Pharmacological characterization of dopamine systems in the nucleus accumbens core and shell , 1992, Neuroscience.

[18]  W. Hays.  Statistics for the social sciences , 1973 .

[19]  G. Hall.  Perceptual learning in human and nonhuman animals: A search for common ground , 2009, Learning & behavior.

[20]  H. Cassaday,et al.  Electrolytic lesions to nucleus accumbens core and shell have dissociable effects on conditioning to discrete and contextual cues in aversive and appetitive procedures respectively , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  M. Delgado,et al.  The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  R. Carelli,et al.  The Nucleus Accumbens and Pavlovian Reward Learning , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[23]  Ann E. Kelley,et al.  Excitotoxic lesions of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens differentially disrupt body weight regulation and motor activity in rat. , 1995 .

[24]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. McNally,et al.  A short intertrial interval facilitates acquisition of context-conditioned fear and a short retention interval facilitates its expression. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[26]  Stephen Maren,et al.  Building and Burying Fear Memories in the Brain , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[27]  C. Maldonado-Irizarry,et al.  Excitotoxic lesions of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens differentially disrupt body weight regulation and motor activity in rat , 1995, Brain Research Bulletin.

[28]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[29]  J. Feldon,et al.  A differential involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens of rats in memory processes. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[30]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing , 1980, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.

[31]  J. Rawlins,et al.  Differential involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition and amphetamine-induced activity , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans , 2004, Nature.