Minimal infeasible sets of connections: a representation for efficient assembly sequence planning

This paper describes methods aimed at increasing the efficiency of cutset-based assembly sequence planners by: (i) providing an alternative representation to precedence constraints which is easy to maintain and facilitates the logical evaluation of assembly operations, (ii) maximizing the reuse of previous results of assembly operation feasibility evaluations and (iii) using exact and heuristic assembly knowledge encoded in a knowledge-based system, which may provide time saving shortcuts to the direct use of geometric algorithms. It is formally proved that in this method it is sufficient to evaluate directly the assembly operations corresponding to the decompositions of a product in its completely assembled state for the generation of all assembly sequences of a product. The feasibility of any other operation, that may be performed in the assembly of the product, can then be logically inferred from these evaluation results. A simple and well known assembly is used to illustrate the application of the approach and facilitate a comparison with other methods.

[1]  Jan Wolter,et al.  Mating constraint languages for assembly sequence planning , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Myung Jin Chung,et al.  Acquisition of assembly constraints without redundancies , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Task sequence planning for robotic assembly , 1989 .

[4]  Randall H. Wilson,et al.  Maintaining geometric dependencies in assembly planning , 1991 .

[5]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Computer-aided Assembly Planning , 1992 .

[6]  Simon D Hill,et al.  Identifying and explaining infeasible assembly operations , 1997 .

[7]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Physical reasoning of interconnection forces for efficient assembly planning , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanical products , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Jan D. Wolter On the automatic generation of assembly plans , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Minimal precedence constraints for integrated assembly and execution planning , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  A. Bourjault Methodology of Assembly Automation: A New Approach , 1988 .

[13]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..