Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2

Cotton plants were grown in CO2-controlled growth chambers in atmospheres of either 35 or 65 Pa CO2. A widely accepted model of C3 leaf photosynthesis was parameterized for leaves from both CO2 treatments using non-linear least squares regression techniques, but in order to achieve reasonable fits, it was necessary to include a phosphate limitation resulting from inadequate triose phosphate utilization. Despite the accumulation of large amounts of starch (>50 g m−2) in the high CO2 plants, the photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in both treatments were similar, although the maximum rate of Rubisco activity (Vcmax), estimated from A versus Ci response curves measured at 29°C, was ∼10% lower in leaves from plants grown in high CO2. The relationship between key model parameters and total leaf N was linear, the only difference between CO2 treatments being a slight reduction in the slope of the line relating Vcmax to leaf N in plants grown at high CO2. Stomatal conductance of leaves of plants grown and measured at 65 Pa CO2 was approximately 32% lower than that of plants grown and measured at 35 Pa. Because photosynthetic capacity of leaves grown in high CO2 was only slightly less than that of leaves grown in 35 Pa CO2, net photosynthesis measured at the growth CO2, light and temperature conditions was approximately 25% greater in leaves of plants grown in high CO2, despite the reduction in leaf conductance. Greater assimilation rate was one factor allowing plants grown in high CO2 to incorporate 30% more biomass during the first 36 d of growth.

[1]  T. Sharkey,et al.  O(2)-insensitive photosynthesis in c(3) plants : its occurrence and a possible explanation. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[2]  J. Mauney,et al.  Relationship of Photosynthetic Rate to Growth and Fruiting of Cotton, Soybean, Sorghum, and Sunflower 1 , 1978 .

[3]  V. Ramanathan The Greenhouse Theory of Climate Change: A Test by an Inadvertent Global Experiment , 1988, Science.

[4]  J. Seemann,et al.  Differences between Wheat Genotypes in Specific Activity of Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase and the Relationship to Photosynthesis. , 1984, Plant physiology.

[5]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[6]  B. Acock,et al.  Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey , 1986 .

[7]  J. Lowther Use of a single sulphuric acid-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles. , 1980 .

[8]  B. Strain,et al.  Effects of CO2 enrichment on growth and photosynthesis in Desmodium paniculatum , 1982 .

[9]  H. Eyring,et al.  The nature of enzyme inhibitions in bacterial luminescence: Sulfanilamide, urethane, temperature and pressure† , 1942 .

[10]  Masatoshi Aoki,et al.  Studies on the carbon dioxide enrichment for plant growth, VII. Changes in dry matter production and photosynthetic rate of cucumber during carbon dioxide enrichment , 1977 .

[11]  Basil Acock,et al.  Predicting the response of plants to increasing carbon dioxide: A critique of plant growth models , 1985 .

[12]  Emil L. Smith THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1937, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  A. Keys Rubisco: its role in photorespiration , 1986 .

[14]  E. DeLucia,et al.  Reversibility of Photosynthetic Inhibition in Cotton after Long-Term Exposure to Elevated CO(2) Concentrations. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[15]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Acclimation of Photosynthesis to Elevated CO(2) in Five C(3) Species. , 1989, Plant physiology.

[16]  J. Morison,et al.  Sensitivity of stomata and water use efficiency to high CO2 , 1985 .

[17]  Boyd R. Strain,et al.  Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation , 1985 .

[18]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Do stomata respond to relative humidity , 1991 .

[19]  B. Strain,et al.  Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[20]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Modelling Stomatal Behaviour and and Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis , 1990 .

[21]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 Concentration , 1977 .

[22]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  Enzymatic Regulation of Photosynthetic CO2, Fixation in C3 Plants , 1988 .