A Vision for the Future of Aeronautical Ground Testing

Abstract : Ground-based infrastructure consisting of wind tunnels and propulsion system test cells has been the predominant tool for the development of aeronautical systems since the Wright Brothers. With advances in modeling and simulation, as well as a reduced tempo for developing new major flight systems, it is reasonable to ask whether these aeronautical ground-test facilities will be needed in the future. The authors project that for the foreseeable future aeronautical systems, although more advanced than today, will still be the major mode for domestic and global transportation as well as for the transport of materiel and delivery of kinetic and nonkinetic effects for the military. Ground- and flight-test facilities will remain the primary sources of information on performance, operability, and durability for the development and sustainment of aeronautical systems. A transformation in the design and use of aeronautical ground-test facilities will be required to maintain their viability as tools in the development of future applications. Through a confluence of design of experiments application, as well as advances in modeling and simulation, data systems, test techniques, flow diagnostics, and networking, there are emerging concepts that can dramatically reduce the overall cycle time for development of aeronautical systems. This article highlights these emerging technologies and creates a vision of how ground-test facilities can be used in the future to dramatically reduce development cycle time. The considerations that need to be addressed in the design of a future wind tunnel to optimize development cycle time are also explored.

[1]  James Clifton,et al.  Aircraft Stability and Control Characteristics Determined by System Identification of CFD Simulations , 2008 .

[2]  Drew Landman,et al.  Response surface methods for efficient complex aircraft configuration aerodynamic characterization , 2007 .

[3]  Mark Melanson An Assessment of the Increase in Wind Tunnel Testing Requirements for Airvehicle Development Over the last 50 Years , 2008 .

[4]  Lisa Anderson The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World , 2010 .

[5]  Michael Mills,et al.  Cycle time reduction strategies and improvements in transonic testing in the AEDC Wind Tunnel 16T , 1999 .

[6]  Marcus L. Skelley,et al.  Integrated Test and Evaluation for the 21 st Century , 2004 .

[7]  J. Wehrmeyer,et al.  Stereo-PIV Data Obtained Behind an F-15 Model Compared to CFD Results * , 2008 .

[8]  T Kegelman Jerome Accelerating Ground-Test Cycle Time: The Six-Minute Model Change and Other Visions for the 21st Century , 1998 .

[9]  Eglin Afb,et al.  Survey of Design of Experiments (DOE) Projects In Developmental Test CY07 -08 , 2009 .

[10]  John T. Best Revitalizing the Technical Excellence of the Workforce at the Arnold Engineering Development Center ( AEDC) and Beyond , 2008 .

[11]  Douglas Muerle The Development and Evolution of a Remote Wind Tunnel Control Room at Eglin AFB , 2007 .

[12]  William Baker,et al.  Growing Technical Excellence in the AEDC T&E Workforce * , 2009 .

[13]  Nagesh Mukundarao Cycle Time Reduction , 2006, 2006 13th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'06).

[14]  Marion L. Laster,et al.  High-Speed/Hypersonic Test and Evaluation Infrastructure Capabilities Study , 2006 .

[15]  James R. Hansen Engineer in Charge: A History of the Langley Aeronautical Laboratory 1917-1958. NASA SP-4305 , 1987 .

[16]  G. Pazilkhairova Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors , 2009 .

[17]  Marvin Sellers Advances in AEDC's Lifetime Pressure-Sensitive Paint Program , 2005 .