Optimization and decision-making framework for multi-staged asteroid deflection campaigns under epistemic uncertainties

Abstract In this study, we introduce a framework for planning and assessing multi-spacecraft asteroid deflection campaigns. In the scenario considered, a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) is nudged away from gravitational keyholes via a kinetic impactor (KI) technique, lest its passage should incur an Earth collision in the future. An asteroid orbiter or/and an impactor is/are used in the precursor stage to obtain uncertain information about the target asteroid, whose launch date and trajectory are optimized using Chebyshev's method and a genetic algorithm. The KI mass is optimized through Monte Carlo simulations to improve the robustness of the method and achieve the minimum required probability of success (PoS). Case scenarios targeting Apophis and Bennu substantiate the utility of the framework in optimizing different deflection campaign architectures and making decisions amongst them via newly proposed visualization methods.

[1]  Takahide Mizuno,et al.  Mass and Local Topography Measurements of Itokawa by Hayabusa , 2006, Science.

[2]  Michael Tauber,et al.  Origin of the Tunguska event , 1995, Nature.

[3]  S. Chesley,et al.  Resonant returns to close approaches: Analytical theory ? , 2003 .

[4]  D. Monet,et al.  Treatment of star catalog biases in asteroid astrometric observations , 2010 .

[5]  Arnold Hanslmeier,et al.  Asteroids, Comets, Meteroites , 2007 .

[6]  Tobias Ziegler,et al.  Momentum enhancement factor estimation for asteroid redirect missions , 2018, Acta Astronautica.

[7]  Paul L. Miller,et al.  Options and uncertainties in planetary defense: Mission planning and vehicle design for flexible response , 2018 .

[8]  Paul L. Miller,et al.  Nuclear and Kinetic Approaches to Asteroid Defense: New Numerical Insights , 2015 .

[9]  F. Johnson,et al.  Approximate finite-thrust trajectory optimization. , 1969 .

[10]  K. A. Holsapple,et al.  Experimental Measurements of Momentum Transfer in Hypervelocity Collisions , 2015 .

[11]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Radar observations of asteroid 25143 Itokawa (1998 SF36) , 2004 .

[12]  Sung Wook Paek,et al.  Asteroid deflection campaign design integrating epistemic uncertainties , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[13]  Dario Izzo,et al.  Optimization of Interplanetary Trajectories for Impulsive and Continuous Asteroid Deflection , 2007 .

[14]  Gianmarco Radice,et al.  Hazardous near Earth asteroid mitigation campaign planning based on uncertain information on fundamental asteroid characteristics , 2014 .

[15]  Antti Näsilä,et al.  European component of the AIDA mission to a binary asteroid: Characterization and interpretation of the impact of the DART mission , 2018, Advances in Space Research.

[16]  Bernd Dachwald,et al.  Head-On Impact Deflection of NEAs: A Case Study for 99942 Apophis , 2007 .

[17]  Sung Wook Paek,et al.  Optimization of Reconfigurable Satellite Constellations Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm , 2019, Sensors.

[18]  D. Yeomans,et al.  Predicting Close Approaches and Estimating Impact Probabilities for Near Earth Objects , 1999 .

[19]  F. Scholten,et al.  A homogeneous nucleus for comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko from its gravity field , 2016, Nature.

[20]  Gerbrand Ceder,et al.  Constructing first-principles phase diagrams of amorphous LixSi using machine-learning-assisted sampling with an evolutionary algorithm. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation , 2019, Icarus.

[22]  M. Louge,et al.  Anomalous behavior of normal kinematic restitution in the oblique impacts of a hard sphere on an elastoplastic plate. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.