Home Sampling for Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV in Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Prospective Observational Study

To determine uptake of home sampling kit (HSK) for STI/HIV compared to clinic-based testing, whether the availability of HSK would increase STI testing rates amongst HIV infected MSM, and those attending a community-based HIV testing clinic compared to historical control. Prospective observational study in three facilities providing STI/HIV testing services in Brighton, UK was conducted. Adult MSM attending/contacting a GUM clinic requesting an STI screen (group 1), HIV infected MSM attending routine outpatient clinic (group 2), and MSM attending a community-based rapid HIV testing service (group 3) were eligible. Participants were required to have no symptomatology consistent with STI and known to be immune to hepatitis A and B (group 1). Eligible men were offered a HSK to obtain self-collected specimens as an alternative to routine testing. HSK uptake compared to conventional clinic-based STI/HIV testing in group 1, increase in STI testing rates due to availability of HSK compared to historical controls in group 2 and 3, and HSK return rates in all settings were calculated. Among the 128 eligible men in group 1, HSK acceptance was higher (62.5% (95% CI: 53.5–70.9)) compared to GUM clinic-based testing (37.5% (95% CI: 29.1–46.5)), (p = 0.0004). Two thirds of eligible MSM offered an HSK in all three groups accepted it, but HSK return rates varied (highest in group 1, 77.5%, lowest in group 3, 16%). HSK for HIV testing was acceptable to 81% of men in group 1. Compared to historical controls, availability of HSK increased the proportion of MSM testing for STIs in group 2 but not in group 3. HSK for STI/HIV offers an alternative to conventional clinic-based testing for MSM seeking STI screening. It significantly increases STI testing uptake in HIV infected MSM. HSK could be considered as an adjunct to clinic-based services to further improve STI/HIV testing in MSM.

[1]  R. Ellks,et al.  Outreach sexual infection screening and postal tests in men who have sex with men: are they comparable to clinic screening? , 2015, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[2]  Michael Rayment,et al.  Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy , 2012, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[3]  E. Elliot,et al.  O20 Home sampling through social network websites: can we reduce undiagnosed HIV? , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[4]  Helen E. Smith,et al.  Home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections: preferences and concerns of men who have sex with men , 2011, Culture, health & sexuality.

[5]  H. Ward,et al.  Contribution of sexually transmitted infections to the sexual transmission of HIV , 2010, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[6]  Helen E. Smith,et al.  Are home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections acceptable among men who have sex with men? , 2009, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  J. Parry,et al.  Self-taken pharyngeal and rectal swabs are appropriate for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in asymptomatic men who have sex with men , 2008, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[8]  C. Lacey,et al.  British HIV Association, BASHH and FSRH guidelines for the management of the sexual and reproductive health of people living with HIV infection 2008 , 2008, HIV medicine.

[9]  Candice M. Daniel,et al.  Internet based HIV prevention research targeting rural MSM: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy , 2008, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[10]  M. Hankins,et al.  Self-sampling for oropharyngeal and rectal specimens to screen for sexually transmitted infections: acceptability among men who have sex with men , 2008, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[11]  A. Sullivan,et al.  National study of HIV testing in men who have sex with men attending genitourinary clinics in the United Kingdom , 2007, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[12]  D. Pillay,et al.  The effects of urethritis on seminal plasma HIV-1 RNA loads in homosexual men not receiving antiretroviral therapy , 2005, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[13]  J. Sterne,et al.  Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  A. McNab,et al.  The national strategy for sexual health and HIV: implications for genitourinary medicine , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[15]  F. Olesen,et al.  Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in general practice: diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and contact tracing. , 1998, Family practice.

[16]  J. Wasserheit,et al.  The dynamic topology of sexually transmitted disease epidemics: implications for prevention strategies. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  J. Parry,et al.  Novel assay for the detection of immunoglobulin G antihuman immunodeficiency virus in untreated saliva and urine , 1993, Journal of medical virology.

[18]  N. Wells HIV and AIDS in the United Kingdom , 1988 .