Predicting the Intent to Purchase Unfamiliar and Familiar Cheeses: The Effects of Attitudes, Expected Liking and Food Neophobia

The attitude model of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) has been applied mainly to predicting the choice of familiar foods; however, the choice of unfamiliar foods may be governed by distinct factors. In the present study, 92 females rated their attitudes and subjective norms about the purchase intentions of two familiar and two unfamiliar cheeses, and the expected and actual pleasantness of them. They also completed the food neophobia scale, which measures the tendency to avoid novel foods. Neophobic persons rated the attitudes and expected and actual taste pleasantness lower than neophilics for all cheeses, except for the most familiar, mild cheese. This suggests that food neophobia also indicates the tendency not only to avoid, but also to dislike novel foods. Before tasting, attitudes and subjective norms together predicted the intent to purchase familiar cheeses better (R2=0.54 and 0.58) than for novel cheeses (R2=0.24 and 0.35); thus, the basic TRA model was not as useful in predicting intent to purchase unfamiliar as familiar cheeses. The predictions especially for the novel cheeses were clearly improved by including expected pleasantness ratings in the model. The usefulness of the food neophobia score as an additional predictor was not clearly supported. Attitudes and subjective norms measured before tasting were poor predictors of purchase intents after tasting, which implies the importance of taste and direct product experience in food choice.

[1]  P. Pliner,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans , 1992, Appetite.

[2]  J. Sobal,et al.  Food Choice: A Conceptual Model of the Process , 1996, Appetite.

[3]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[4]  M. Pelchat,et al.  “Try it; it's good and it's good for you ”: Effects of Taste and Nutrition Information on Willingness to Try Novel Foods , 1997, Appetite.

[5]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[6]  H. C. M. Trijp Product-Related Determinants of Variety-Seeking Behavior for Foods , 1994, Appetite.

[7]  L. Birch,et al.  Pass the sugar, pass the salt: Experience dictates preference. , 1990 .

[8]  P. Pliner,et al.  The Effects of Fear and Hunger on Food Neophobia in Humans , 1995, Appetite.

[9]  C. Gallois,et al.  The theory of reasoned action and problem-focused research , 1993 .

[10]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Including Moral Dimensions of Choice Within the Structure of the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1995 .

[11]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods, liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price , 1996 .

[12]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food , 1998 .

[13]  L. Birch,et al.  I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences , 1982, Appetite.

[14]  Nicolette J. van der Klaauw,et al.  The Contribution of Chemosensory Factors to Individual Differences in Reported Food Preferences , 1994, Appetite.

[15]  A. V. Cardello,et al.  Role of Sensory and Cognitive Information in the Enhancement of Certainty and Linking for Novel and Familiar Foods , 1994, Appetite.

[16]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  ASSESSING AND STRUCTURING ATTITUDES TOWARD THE USE OF GENE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD-PRODUCTION - THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED ETHICAL OBLIGATION , 1995 .

[17]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Attitudes and choice of flavoured milks: extensions of fishbein and Ajzen's theory of reasoned action , 1991 .

[18]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Correlates of Human Food Neophobia , 1998, Appetite.

[19]  R. Mattes Influences on acceptance of bitter foods and beverages , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial versus Advertising: , 1983 .

[21]  Hely Tuorila,et al.  Selection of milks with varying fat contents and related overall liking, attitudes, norms and intentions , 1987, Appetite.

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[23]  P. Sparks,et al.  SELF-IDENTITY AND THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR - ASSESSING THE ROLE OF IDENTIFICATION WITH GREEN CONSUMERISM , 1992 .

[24]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Social psychology: Attitudes, attraction and influence , 1986 .

[25]  P. Sjödén,et al.  Reasons for Rejection of Food Items in Swedish Families with Children Aged 2–17 , 1996, Appetite.

[26]  P. Sjödén,et al.  Food and General Neophobia in Swedish Families: Parent–Child Comparisons and Relationships with Serving Specific Foods , 1996, Appetite.

[27]  H. Salovaara,et al.  Attitudes, norms, intentions and hedonic responses in the selection of low salt bread in a longitudinal choice experiment , 1986, Appetite.

[28]  P. Rozin,et al.  Human food selection: the interaction of biology, culture and individual experience. , 1982 .

[29]  P. Rozin,et al.  Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust , 1997 .

[30]  Cees de Graaf,et al.  A review of selected studies assessing social-psychological determinants of fat and cholesterol intake , 1991 .

[31]  A. Liska A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude–behavior model. , 1984 .