Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state through the ectopic expression of defined transcription factors. Understanding the mechanism and kinetics of this transformation may shed light on the nature of developmental potency and suggest strategies with improved efficiency or safety. Here we report an integrative genomic analysis of reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts and B lymphocytes. Lineage-committed cells show a complex response to the ectopic expression involving induction of genes downstream of individual reprogramming factors. Fully reprogrammed cells show gene expression and epigenetic states that are highly similar to embryonic stem cells. In contrast, stable partially reprogrammed cell lines show reactivation of a distinctive subset of stem-cell-related genes, incomplete repression of lineage-specifying transcription factors, and DNA hypermethylation at pluripotency-related loci. These observations suggest that some cells may become trapped in partially reprogrammed states owing to incomplete repression of transcription factors, and that DNA de-methylation is an inefficient step in the transition to pluripotency. We demonstrate that RNA inhibition of transcription factors can facilitate reprogramming, and that treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors can improve the overall efficiency of the reprogramming process.

[1]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 1996, Development.

[2]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Matthew Tudor,et al.  Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Y. Qi,et al.  The ARF Tumor Suppressor: Keeping Myc on a Leash , 2005, Cell cycle.

[5]  M. Eilers,et al.  Transcriptional regulation and transformation by Myc proteins , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  A. Gnirke,et al.  Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  D. Peeper,et al.  KLF4, p21 and context-dependent opposing forces in cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Efficient method to generate single‐copy transgenic mice by site‐specific integration in embryonic stem cells , 2006, Genesis.

[9]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Transcriptional repression and DNA hypermethylation of a small set of ES cell marker genes in male germline stem cells , 2006, BMC Developmental Biology.

[10]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[11]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2007, Nature.

[12]  Shulan Tian,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[13]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[14]  E. Lander,et al.  The Mammalian Epigenome , 2007, Cell.

[15]  S. Yamanaka Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[16]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[17]  Marius Wernig,et al.  Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  N. Terada,et al.  A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[19]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Zic3 is required for maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  J. Utikal,et al.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[21]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[22]  K. Plath,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  George Q. Daley,et al.  Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors , 2008, Nature.

[24]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells , 2008, Nature.

[25]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[26]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells , 2008, Science.

[27]  D. Scadden,et al.  Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  C. Lengner,et al.  Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[29]  M. Surani,et al.  Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Capturing Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.

[31]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Marius Wernig,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Terminally Differentiated Mature B Lymphocytes to Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.

[33]  R. Young,et al.  Stem Cells, the Molecular Circuitry of Pluripotency and Nuclear Reprogramming , 2008, Cell.