How Does Exposure to Changing Opinions or Reaffirmation Opinions Influence the Thoughts of Observers and Their Trust in Robot Discussions?

This study investigated how exposure to changing or reaffirmation opinions in robot conversations influences the impressions of observers and their trust in media. Even though the provided conversational contents include the same amount of information, their order, positive/negative attitudes, and discussion styles change their perceived impressions. We conducted a web survey using video stimuli, where two robots discussed Japan’s first state of emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We prepared two patterns of opinion changes to a different side (positive–negative and negative–positive) and two patterns of opinion reaffirmation (positive–positive and negative–negative) with identical information contents; we only modified their order. The experimental results showed that exposure to opinion changes from the positive side (i.e., negative–positive) or positive opinion reaffirmation (positive–positive) effectively provides positive and fair impressions. Exposure to an opinion that became negative (i.e., positive–negative) effectively provided negative and fair impressions, although negative opinion reaffirmation (negative–negative) led to significantly less trust in media.

[1]  M. Imai,et al.  Multi-device trust transfer: Can trust be transferred among multiple devices? , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[2]  Kai Chi Yam,et al.  Adults still can't resist: A social robot can induce normative conformity , 2022, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  A Robot That Encourages Self-Disclosure to Reduce Anger Mood , 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[4]  Han-Pang Huang,et al.  A Smart Sterilization Robot System With Chlorine Dioxide for Spray Disinfection , 2021, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Matthew S. Tata,et al.  Speech Interaction to Control a Hands-Free Delivery Robot for High-Risk Health Care Scenarios , 2021, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[6]  J. Ruiz-del-Solar,et al.  Mental and Emotional Health Care for COVID-19 Patients: Employing Pudu, a Telepresence Robot , 2021, IEEE robotics & automation magazine.

[7]  Yan Luximon,et al.  The face of trust: The effect of robot face ratio on consumer preference , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Conor McGinn,et al.  Exploring the Applicability of Robot-Assisted UV Disinfection in Radiology , 2021, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[9]  Daniel Leising,et al.  There Is No Primacy Effect in Interpersonal Perception: A Series of Preregistered Analyses Using Judgments of Actual Behavior , 2020 .

[10]  T. Iio,et al.  Two is better than one: Social rewards from two agents enhance offline improvements in motor skills more than single agent , 2020, PloS one.

[11]  Xiaoguang Zhang,et al.  ALPHRED: A Multi-Modal Operations Quadruped Robot for Package Delivery Applications , 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[12]  Masahide Yuasa,et al.  Do You Forgive Past Mistakes of Animated Agents? A Study of Instances of Assistance by Animated Agents , 2020, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[13]  H. Boomgaarden,et al.  News media trust and its impact on media use: toward a framework for future research , 2020, Annals of the International Communication Association.

[14]  Matthew Gombolay,et al.  Effects of Anthropomorphism and Accountability on Trust in Human Robot Interaction , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing , 2019, Journal of Services Marketing.

[16]  Jessica Sullivan The Primacy Effect in Impression Formation: Some Replications and Extensions , 2019 .

[17]  Omar Mubin,et al.  Social Robots in Public Spaces: A Meta-review , 2018, ICSR.

[18]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity , 2018, Science Robotics.

[19]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Humans Conform to Robots: Disambiguating Trust, Truth, and Conformity , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Jaap Ham,et al.  A Persuasive Robot to Stimulate Energy Conservation: The Influence of Positive and Negative Social Feedback and Task Similarity on Energy-Consumption Behavior , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[21]  Akiko Kamada,et al.  Cultural differences in the primacy effect for person perception. , 2013, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[22]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[24]  Brian T. Gill,et al.  "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[25]  J. Forgas Can negative affect eliminate the power of first impressions? Affective influences on primacy and recency effects in impression formation , 2011 .

[26]  V. A. Tadipatri,et al.  Neural oscillations associated with the primacy and recency effects of verbal working memory , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Are your participants gaming the system?: screening mechanical turk workers , 2010, CHI.

[28]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[29]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Humanoid Robots as a Broadcasting Communication Medium in Open Public Spaces , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Persuasive Design of Destination Web Sites: An Analysis of First Impression , 2008 .

[31]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Primacy and Recency Effects on Clicking Behavior , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  H. Demaree,et al.  Primacy and Recency Effects Found Using Affective Word Lists , 2004, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[33]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[34]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation. , 1989 .

[36]  William D. Crano,et al.  Primacy versus Recency in Retention of Information and Opinion Change , 1977 .

[37]  Warner Wilson,et al.  Recency effects in face-to-face interaction. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  W. H. Crockett,et al.  COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY AND PRIMACY-RECENCY EFFECTS IN IMPRESSION FORMATION. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of abnormal psychology.