«Inversion» as focalization and related questions

The main empirical area studied in this article concerns so called subject «inversion» structures. The proposal is put forth that the postverbal subject is licensed in the specifier of a low Focus projection, internal to the functional clausal architecture. Focus is considered a morphosyntactic feature giving rise to its own projection and constituting a regular checking domain. Consequences of the hypothesis are investigated for other structures assumed to involve the same process of clause internal focalization such as: structures containing «emphatic» pronouns, structures undergoing complement reordering, unaccusative structures. Some speculative remarks are also made on the so called process of «marginalization» which is taken to constitute a case of clause internal «topicalization»; the process is also assumed to be involved in interrogative structures necessarily requiring a postverbal subject which displays behaviors different from the focalized postverbal subject of declarative sentences.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[2]  Richard S. Kayne,et al.  Stylistic Inversion, Successive Cyclicity and Move NP in French , 1978 .

[3]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[4]  A. Belletti,et al.  THE SYNTAX OF “NE”: SOME THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS , 1981 .

[5]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[6]  Ken Safir,et al.  Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect , 1982 .

[7]  Jean-Yves Pollock Accord, Chaines Impersonnelles Et Variables , 1983 .

[8]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[9]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  The Case of Unaccusatives , 1988 .

[10]  Dominique Sportiche A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure , 1988 .

[11]  S. Kuroda Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese , 1988 .

[12]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  Types of Ā-dependencies , 1990 .

[13]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  The position of subjects , 1991 .

[14]  J. S. Y. Pujols,et al.  Agreement and subjects , 1992 .

[15]  渡邊 明 Wh-in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation , 1992 .

[16]  L. Haegeman Some speculations on argument shift, clitics and crossing in West Flemish , 1993 .

[17]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[18]  Margarita Suner,et al.  V-movement and the licensing of argumental Wh-phrases in Spanish , 1994 .

[19]  Juan Uriagereka Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western romance , 1995 .

[20]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  The order of verbal complements: A comparative study , 1995 .

[21]  A. Kemenade Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages By Sten Vikner (review) , 1995 .

[22]  MARIA TERESA GUASTI On the controversial status of Romance interrogatives , 1996 .

[23]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Subject positions and the roles of TP , 1996 .

[24]  A. Cardinaletti Subjects and clause structure , 1996 .

[25]  Howard Lasnik Case and Expletives: Notes Toward a Parametric Account , 1996 .

[26]  F. Ordóñez,et al.  Word order and clausal structure in Spanish and other Romance languages , 1997 .

[27]  K. Kiss Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[28]  M. Zubizarreta Prosody, Focus, and Word Order , 1998 .

[29]  Je veux que parte Paul , 1998 .

[30]  Brigitte Kampers-Manhe Je veux que parte Paul: A neglected construction , 1998 .

[31]  M. Picallo On the Extended Projection Principle and null expletive subjects , 1998 .

[32]  E. Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Parametrizing Agr: Word Order, V-Movement and Epp-Checking , 1998 .

[33]  M. Starke,et al.  The Typology of Structural Deficiency. A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns , 1999 .

[34]  C. Cecchetto A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance , 1999 .

[35]  Genoveva Puskás,et al.  Word order in Hungarian , 2000 .