A Well-Defined Composite Indicator: An Application to Corporate Social Responsibility

This paper introduces a model to construct composite indicators for performance evaluation of decision making units, which is based upon the determination of the least distance from each assessed unit to a frontier estimated by data envelopment analysis. This generates less demanding targets from a benchmarking point of view. The model also makes it possible to account for the existence of slacks in all the considered dimensions (sub-indicators), playing with the notion of Pareto efficiency. Additionally, our approach satisfies units invariance, translation invariance and strong monotonicity and ensures that the weights used for the aggregation of the sub-indicators are always strictly positive. All previous approaches based on data envelopment analysis have failed to satisfy at least one of these properties. We also implement a new version of the Russell output measure of technical efficiency working with full-dimensional efficient facets. Finally, the new approach is illustrated by an application to the sphere of corporate social responsibility, showing the main empirical implications of the theoretical properties.

[1]  J. Aparicio,et al.  Enhancing the Measurement of Composite Indicators of Corporate Social Performance , 2019, Social Indicators Research.

[2]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  BiLevel programming Data Envelopment Analysis with constrained resource , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Eduardo González,et al.  From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  T. R. Nunamaker,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of non‐profit organizations: A critical evaluation , 1985 .

[5]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[6]  Francesco Vidoli,et al.  Non-compensability in Composite Indicators: A Robust Directional Frontier Method , 2015 .

[7]  C. Lovell,et al.  Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy , 1995 .

[8]  Francesco Vidoli,et al.  Spatial directional robust Benefit of the Doubt approach in presence of undesirable output: An application to Italian waste sector , 2020 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[12]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Dimension reduction in nonparametric models of production , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[14]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  A survey on measuring efficiency through the determination of the least distance in data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[15]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis for Composite Indicators: A Multiple Layer Model , 2013 .

[16]  Atsuhiko Kai,et al.  LEAST DISTANCE BASED INEFFICIENCY MEASURES ON THE PARETO-EFFICIENT FRONTIER IN DEA , 2012 .

[17]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: an extended facet approach , 1996 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[19]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  B. Auer Do Socially Responsible Investment Policies Add or Destroy European Stock Portfolio Value? , 2016 .

[21]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[22]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[24]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  A comment on multi-stage DEA methodology , 2001, Oper. Res. Lett..

[25]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Efficiency bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[26]  A. Bessent,et al.  Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis , 1988, Oper. Res..

[27]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[28]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis ☆ , 2017 .

[29]  L. Cherchye,et al.  Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU , 2004 .

[30]  S. Waddock,et al.  Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .

[31]  R. Färe,et al.  Spatial Targeting of Agri-Environmental Policy Using Bilevel Evolutionary Optimization , 2014 .

[32]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .

[33]  Walter Briec,et al.  Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[34]  C. Lovell,et al.  One Market, One Number? A Composite Indicator Assessment of EU Internal Market Dynamics , 2005 .

[35]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  BAM: a bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models , 2011 .

[36]  Elisa Fusco,et al.  Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: A directional proposal , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Identification of congestion in data envelopment analysis under the occurrence of multiple projections: A reliable method capable of dealing with negative data , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  R. Raab,et al.  Identifying Subareas that Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency , 2002 .

[41]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[42]  Jie Lu,et al.  An extended Kuhn-Tucker approach for linear bilevel programming , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[43]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[44]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies , 2003 .

[45]  Does Corporate Social Responsibility Create Shareholder Value? The Importance of Long-Term Investors , 2017 .

[46]  Michael J. Maloni,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry , 2006 .

[47]  I. Singer,et al.  Duality for Nonconvex Approximation and Optimization , 2010 .

[48]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[49]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA , 2014 .

[50]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[52]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[53]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Efficiency measurement with a non-convex free disposal hull technology , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[54]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The weighted additive distance function , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Input-output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink,et al.  Measuring corporate sustainability performance– the case of European food and beverage companies , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[58]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal , 2017, Omega.

[59]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Constructing composite indicators with imprecise data: A proposal , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[60]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Constructing macroeconomic performance index of Indian states using DEA , 2012 .

[61]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  On the identification of the global reference set in data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[62]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Integer and Combinatorial Optimization , 1988 .

[63]  Tarmo Räty Efficient Facet Based Efficiency Index: A Variable Returns to Scale Specification , 2002 .

[64]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..