Justified Sloppiness In Anaphoric Reference

[1]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Semi-productive Polysemy and Sense Extension , 1995, J. Semant..

[2]  A. Sorace,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY , 1996 .

[3]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Inferring domain plans in question-answering , 1986 .

[4]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Semantic Ambiguity and Perceived Ambiguity , 1995, ArXiv.

[5]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[6]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[7]  Ethel Schuster,et al.  Pronominal Reference to Events and Actions: Evidence From Naturally-Occurring Data , 1988 .

[8]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[10]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[11]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions , 1993 .

[12]  Renata Vieira,et al.  A Corpus-based Investigation of Definite Description Use , 1997, CL.

[13]  Reinhard Muskens.  Order-independence and underspecification , 1995 .

[14]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Co-Indexing Labelled DRSs to Represent and Reason with Ambiguities , 1995, ArXiv.

[15]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse , 1979 .

[16]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Discourse interpretation and the scope of operators , 1994 .

[18]  Simon Garrod,et al.  On the real-time character of interpretation during reading , 1985 .

[19]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: Construction, Representation and Deduction , 1993, J. Semant..

[20]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis , 1991, ArXiv.

[21]  A. Goldman.  Theory of Human Action , 1970 .

[22]  J. Sadock,et al.  Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them , 1975 .

[23]  Hiyan Alshawi,et al.  Monotonic Semantic Interpretation , 1992, ACL.

[24]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[25]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  Monotonic Syntactic Processing : A Cross-linguistic Study of Attachment and Reanalysis , 1996 .

[26]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[27]  Christoph Schwarze,et al.  Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language , 1983 .

[28]  Kees van Deemter,et al.  Semantic ambiguity and underspecification , 1996 .

[29]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .