Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm

Aims to address a gap in the literature about quality criteria for validity and reliability in qualitative research within the realism scientific paradigm. Six comprehensive and explicit criteria for judging realism research are developed, drawing on the three elements of a scientific paradigm of ontology, epistemology and methodology. The first two criteria concern ontology, that is, ontological appropriateness and contingent validity. The third criterion concerns epistemology: multiple perceptions of participants and of peer researchers. The final three criteria concern methodology: methodological trustworthiness, analytic generalisation and construct validity. Comparisons are made with criteria in other paradigms, particularly positivism and constructivism. An example of the use of the criteria is given. In conclusion, this paper’s set of six criteria will facilitate the further adoption of the realism paradigm and its evaluation in marketing research about, for instance, networks and relationship marketing.

[1]  Roy Bhaskar.  The Possibility Of Naturalism Vol.-i , 1979 .

[2]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[3]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[4]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF UNOBSERVABLES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[5]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[6]  H. Tsoukas.  The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations , 1989 .

[7]  C. Perry.  Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing , 1998 .

[8]  Kathleen Manning,et al.  Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Methodological Considerations Without Prescription , 1997 .

[9]  Boris Magnusson,et al.  Technology integration , 1996, CSUR.

[10]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[11]  Robert Chia,et al.  Essai : Thirty Years On: From Organizational Structures to the Organization of Thought , 1997 .

[12]  C. Perry,et al.  Realism’s role among scientific paradigms in marketing research , 1999 .

[13]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[14]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[15]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing , 1983 .

[16]  Jimmy Hill,et al.  A multidimensional study of the key determinants of effective SME marketing activity: Part 1 , 2001 .

[17]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[18]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .