A New Method for UAV Lidar Precision Testing Used for the Evaluation of an Affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 Scanner

Lately, affordable unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-lidar systems have started to appear on the market, highlighting the need for methods facilitating proper verification of their accuracy. However, the dense point cloud produced by such systems makes the identification of individual points that could be used as reference points difficult. In this paper, we propose such a method utilizing accurately georeferenced targets covered with high-reflectivity foil, which can be easily extracted from the cloud; their centers can be determined and used for the calculation of the systematic shift of the lidar point cloud. Subsequently, the lidar point cloud is cleaned of such systematic shift and compared with a dense SfM point cloud, thus yielding the residual accuracy. We successfully applied this method to the evaluation of an affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 scanner mounted on the UAV DJI Matrice 300 and found that the accuracies of this system (3.5 cm in all directions after removal of the global georeferencing error) are better than manufacturer-declared values (10/5 cm horizontal/vertical). However, evaluation of the color information revealed a relatively high (approx. 0.2 m) systematic shift.

[1]  Ludovít Kovanic,et al.  Analysis of the Suitability of High-Resolution DEM Obtained Using ALS and UAS (SfM) for the Identification of Changes and Monitoring the Development of Selected Geohazards in the Alpine Environment - A Case Study in High Tatras, Slovakia , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Marco Balsi,et al.  Preliminary Archeological Site Survey by UAV-Borne Lidar: A Case Study , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Yosoon Choi,et al.  Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Mining from Exploration to Reclamation: A Review , 2020, Minerals.

[4]  J. Siwiec.  Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning of Low and High Above Ground Level for Selected Infrastructure Objects , 2018 .

[5]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Concept and Performance Evaluation of a Novel UAV-Borne Topo-Bathymetric LiDAR Sensor , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Saleh Abu Dabous,et al.  UAV-Based Remote Sensing Applications for Bridge Condition Assessment , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Wu Xiao,et al.  A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: current status and future perspectives , 2019, International Journal of Coal Science & Technology.

[9]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Development and Performance Evaluation of a Very Low-Cost UAV-Lidar System for Forestry Applications , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Michael J. Starek,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of sUAS Photogrammetry with PPK Positioning for Infrastructure Mapping , 2021, Drones.

[11]  Kai Zhang,et al.  UAV-Borne LiDAR Crop Point Cloud Enhancement Using Grasshopper Optimization and Point Cloud Up-Sampling Network , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Emmanuel Augereau,et al.  RTK GNSS-Assisted Terrestrial SfM Photogrammetry without GCP: Application to Coastal Morphodynamics Monitoring , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Development and Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost UAV Laser Scanner System (LasUAV) , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[14]  P. Blišťan,et al.  Surveying and High-Resolution Topography of the Ochtiná Aragonite Cave Based on TLS and Digital Photogrammetry , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[15]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  Boosting the Timeliness of UAV Large Scale Mapping. Direct Georeferencing Approaches: Operational Strategies and Best Practices , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[16]  Yi-Chun Lin,et al.  Evaluation of UAV LiDAR for Mapping Coastal Environments , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Rudolf Urban,et al.  Photogrammetry Using UAV-Mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing Strategies without GCPs , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jorge Matos,et al.  Quality Control of Outsourced LiDAR Data Acquired with a UAV: A Case Study , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[19]  P. Blišťan,et al.  TLS and SfM Approach for Bulk Density Determination of Excavated Heterogeneous Raw Materials , 2020, Minerals.

[20]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[21]  M. Dihkan,et al.  Automatic detection of power transmission lines and risky object locations using UAV LiDAR data , 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[22]  Zulkepli Majid,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of digital terrain model based on different flying altitudes and conditional of terrain using UAV LiDAR technology , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[23]  Giuseppina Vacca,et al.  The Use of Nadir and Oblique UAV Images for Building Knowledge , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[24]  Barbara Zabota,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of UAV-Photogrammetric-Derived Products Using PPK and GCPs in Challenging Terrains: In Search of Optimized Rockfall Mapping , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Ronghao Yang,et al.  An Entropy-Weighting Method for Efficient Power-Line Feature Evaluation and Extraction from LiDAR Point Clouds , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Jon Miller,et al.  Analysis of UAS Flight Altitude and Ground Control Point Parameters on DEM Accuracy along a Complex, Developed Coastline , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Adam Salach,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Point Clouds from LiDAR and Dense Image Matching Acquired Using the UAV Platform for DTM Creation , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[28]  M. Štroner,et al.  Suitability of Aerial Photogrammetry for Dump Documentation and Volume Determination in Large Areas , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[29]  Peter Surový,et al.  The Use of UAV Mounted Sensors for Precise Detection of Bark Beetle Infestation , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Deep Learning Based Classification of LiDAR and UAV Points Clouds for DTM Creation and Flood Risk Mapping , 2019, Geosciences.