What contribution can insights from the complexity sciences make to the theory and practice of development management

This paper offers a critique of existing ways of understanding management practice in International Non-Government Organisations (INGOs) and compares and contrasts these with insights drawn from the complexity sciences. The authors put forward a more radical interpretation of complexity theory as it might be taken up in organisations rather than suggesting that it can be accommodated with existing theories based in systems thinking. They suggest that understanding the process of organising as contingent, paradoxical and experiential could profoundly refocus the attention of managers and practitioners alike and lead to an intensifying of practice as more consciously political. In being more open to others, including their partners and beneficiaries, staff in INGOs may be more ready to change themselves and their ideas. At the same time, the authors point out the existing dynamics of current practice and the way it perpetuates itself, no matter how problematic. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Gordon Wilson,et al.  Learning for Development , 2009 .

[2]  N. Gulrajani.  The future of development management: examining possibilities and potential , 2009 .

[3]  C. Mowles.  Values in international development organisations: negotiating non-negotiables , 2008 .

[4]  Bill Cooke,et al.  The New Development Management: Critiquing the Dual Modernization , 2008 .

[5]  P. Scott-Villiers.  The Aid Chain: Coercion and Commitment in Development NGOs , 2007 .

[6]  C. Mowles.  Promises of transformation: just how different are international development NGOs? , 2007 .

[7]  Robert Simpson,et al.  Design for development: a review of emerging methodologies , 2007 .

[8]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Idealized Design: How to Dissolve Tomorrow's Crisis...Today , 2006 .

[9]  J. Murphy.  The World Bank, INGOs, and Civil Society: Converging Agendas? The Case of Universal Basic Education in Niger , 2005 .

[10]  R. Eyben.  Donors' Learning Difficulties: Results, Relationships and Responsibilities , 2005 .

[11]  John Daniel.  Learning for Development: What Kind of Development? What Kind of Learning? , 2005 .

[12]  Rick Davies.  Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change , 2005 .

[13]  H. Tsoukas.  Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology , 2004 .

[14]  D. Mosse,et al.  Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice , 2004 .

[15]  B. Cooke.  The Managing of the (Third) World , 2004 .

[16]  Nabeel Hamdi,et al.  Small Change: About the Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities , 2004 .

[17]  Rick Davies,et al.  Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change , 2004 .

[18]  Anta Kumar Giri,et al.  A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities , 2003 .

[19]  Ananta Kumar Giri,et al.  A Moral Critique of Development , 2003 .

[20]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[21]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[22]  Douglas Griffin,et al.  The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-Organization and Ethics , 2001 .

[23]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity , 2001 .

[24]  D. Lewis.  The management of non-governmental development organizations : an introduction , 2001 .

[25]  D. Lewis.  The management of non-governmental development organizations , 2001 .

[26]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Systems approaches to management , 2002 .

[27]  Richard Tanner Pascale,et al.  Surfing the edge of chaos : the laws of nature and the new laws of business , 2000 .

[28]  T. Dichter.  Globalization and Its Effects on NGOs: Efflorescence or a Blurring of Roles and Relevance? , 1999 .

[29]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[30]  Robert Chia,et al.  From Complexity Science to Complex Thinking: Organization as Simple Location , 1998 .

[31]  Johan Goudsblom,et al.  Norbert Elias on Civilization, Power, and Knowledge : Selected Writings , 1998 .

[32]  John H. Holland,et al.  Emergence. , 1997, Philosophica.

[33]  John Farrington,et al.  Development as Process: Concepts and Methods for Working With Complexity , 1998 .

[34]  Charles S. Peirce,et al.  Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism , 1997 .

[35]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  At Home in the Universe , 1995 .

[36]  C. Roche.  Operationality in turbulence: the need for change , 1994 .

[37]  J. Sutherland.  The Quark and the Jaguar , 1994 .

[38]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[39]  Margaret J. Wheatley,et al.  Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe , 1992 .

[40]  Norbert Elias,et al.  The Society of Individuals , 1993 .

[41]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[42]  Norbert Elias,et al.  Involvement And Detachment , 1987 .

[43]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[44]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[45]  P. Bourdieu.  The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[46]  Norbert Elias,et al.  What Is Sociology , 1978 .

[47]  A. Giddens.  NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[48]  E. Robinson.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine , 1963 .

[49]  G. Mead.  Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1) , 1934 .

[50]  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,et al.  The Phenomenology of Mind , 1911, Nature.