Collaborative Worlds and Avatar-Based Communication: A Comparison of Virtual Worlds with Traditional Computer-Mediated Communications Media

Interest in virtual worlds from both academic and practitioner perspectives continues to grow. As a relatively new area of research, exploratory efforts to capitalize on and understand this new computer-mediated communications medium have been varied and multi-disciplinary, but also dangerously fragmented. Avatar-based communication distinguishes virtual worlds from traditional communications media and conceptually enables a potentially richer communications medium. Utilizing an integrative theoretical approach drawing from theories of social presence, media richness, media synchronicity, social influence, technology acceptance, and channel expansion, we seek to understand how virtual worlds compare with other communications media. Preliminary results from two phases of a Delphi study with expert participants present interesting findings. While not surprising that face-to-face communications are preferred in a wide variety of situations, what is surprising is that virtual worlds do not appear to be favorably ranked as compared to other leaner traditional communications media. Other results, implications and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  Nick Yee,et al.  The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-User Online Graphical Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[3]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[4]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[5]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[6]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beyond media richness: an empirical test of media synchronicity theory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Effect of Behavioral Realism and Form Realism of Real-Time Avatar Faces on Verbal Disclosure, Nonverbal Disclosure, Emotion Recognition, and Copresence in Dyadic Interaction , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[9]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[10]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[11]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[12]  M. Labes,et al.  Human Capital Management , 2006 .

[13]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[14]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998, CACM.

[16]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[17]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[19]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[21]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[22]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[23]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study 1 , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[25]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[26]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[27]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[29]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[30]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[31]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games , 2006, CHI.

[32]  Blake Ives,et al.  STA Travel Island: Marketing First Life Travel Services in Second Life , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[34]  Rebecca Jestice,et al.  Team collaboration in virtual worlds , 2007, DATB.

[35]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  R. Rice Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .