Re-Thinking EEG-Based Non-Invasive Brain Interfaces: Modeling and Analysis

Brain interfaces are cyber-physical systems that aim to harvest information from the (physical) brain through sensing mechanisms, extract information about the underlying processes, and decide/actuate accordingly. Nonetheless, the brain interfaces are still in their infancy, but reaching to their maturity quickly as several initiatives are released to push forward their development (e.g., NeuraLink by Elon Musk and `typing-by-brain' by Facebook). This has motivated us to revisit the design of EEG-based non-invasive brain interfaces. Specifically, current methodologies entail a highly skilled neuro-functional approach and evidence-based a priori knowledge about specific signal features and their interpretation from a neuro-physiological point of view. Hereafter, we propose to demystify such approaches, as we propose to leverage new time-varying complex network models that equip us with a fractal dynamical characterization of the underlying processes. Subsequently, the parameters of the proposed complex network models can be explained from a system's perspective, and, consecutively, used for classification using machine learning algorithms and/or actuation laws determined using control system's theory. Besides, the proposed system identification methods and techniques have computational complexities comparable with those currently used in EEG-based brain interfaces, which enable comparable online performances. Furthermore, we foresee that the proposed models and approaches are also valid using other invasive and non-invasive technologies. Finally, we illustrate and experimentally evaluate this approach on real EEG-datasets to assess and validate the proposed methodology. The classification accuracies are high even on having less number of training samples.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[2]  Patrick Flandrin,et al.  Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fractional Brownian motion , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Paul Bogdan,et al.  A cyber-physical system approach to artificial pancreas design , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS).

[4]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[5]  Rabab K Ward,et al.  A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain–computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Boosting bit rates in noninvasive EEG single-trial classifications by feature combination and multiclass paradigms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 2012 .

[8]  Dominik Sierociuk,et al.  Adaptive Feedback Control of Fractional Order Discrete State-Space Systems , 2005, International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06).

[9]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  Characterization of the passive responses of live skeletal muscle using the quasi-linear theory of viscoelasticity. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Saul Rodriguez,et al.  A spatio-temporal fractal model for a CPS approach to brain-machine-body interfaces , 2016, 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[11]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[12]  S. Nicolle,et al.  Shear mechanical properties of the spleen: experiment and analytical modelling. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[13]  Gaurav Gupta,et al.  Dealing with Unknown Unknowns: Identification and Selection of Minimal Sensing for Fractional Dynamics with Unknown Inputs , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[14]  Shirley M Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  Exploring two novel features for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: Multifractal cumulants and predictive complexity , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[16]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  T. Williams,et al.  Nonlinear Muscles, Passive Viscoelasticity and Body Taper Conspire To Create Neuromechanical Phase Lags in Anguilliform Swimmers , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[19]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  An MEG-based brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  Todd C Doehring,et al.  Fractional order viscoelasticity of the aortic valve cusp: an alternative to quasilinear viscoelasticity. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Principles of a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  C Wex,et al.  Experimental analysis of the mechanical behavior of the viscoelastic porcine pancreas and preliminary case study on the human pancreas. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[23]  V. E. Tarasov Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media , 2011 .

[24]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Eliza Strickland Silicon valley's latest craze: brain tech [News] , 2017, IEEE Spectrum.

[26]  T.M. McGinnity,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Spectral Approaches to Feature Extraction for EEG-Based Motor Imagery Classification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  fMRI Brain-Computer Interface: A Tool for Neuroscientific Research and Treatment , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  Fabien Lotte,et al.  A Tutorial on EEG Signal Processing Techniques for Mental State Recognition in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2014 .

[30]  Yuankun Xue,et al.  Constructing Compact Causal Mathematical Models for Complex Dynamics , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).

[31]  Masakatsu G. Fujie,et al.  Viscoelastic and Nonlinear Liver Modeling for Needle Insertion Simulation , 2012 .

[32]  N. M. Grahovac,et al.  Modelling of the hamstring muscle group by use of fractional derivatives , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[33]  K. Wang,et al.  Viscoelasticity of the sarcomere matrix of skeletal muscles. The titin-myosin composite filament is a dual-stage molecular spring. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[35]  Ivan Cohen,et al.  In Vivo Mapping of Brain Elasticity in Small Animals Using Shear Wave Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Radu Marculescu,et al.  Heterogeneous Structure of Stem Cells Dynamics: Statistical Models and Quantitative Predictions , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[37]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Minimum number of sensors to ensure observability of physiological systems: A case study , 2016, 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[38]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  Comparative study of band-power extraction techniques for Motor Imagery classification , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB).