Users' relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Edie M. Rasmussen,et al. Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] Paul B. Kantor,et al. A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap* , 1988 .
[3] Paul B. Kantor,et al. A study of information seeking and retrieving. I. background and methodology , 1988 .
[4] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .
[5] Samantha Kelly Hastings,et al. Query Categories in a Study of Intellectual Access to Digitized Art Images. , 1995 .
[6] Peiling Wang,et al. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection , 1998 .
[7] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..
[8] Carol L. Barry,et al. Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. , 1988 .
[9] Linda Schamber,et al. Relevance Criteria Uses and Importance: Progress in Development of a Measurement Scale. , 1999 .
[10] Abby Goodrum,et al. Multidimensional scaling of video surrogates , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Michael B. Eisenberg,et al. A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..
[12] john maccoll,et al. ACM / IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries , 2001 .
[13] Susanne Ornager. Image Retrieval: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical User Studies on Accessing Information in Images. , 1997 .
[14] S. P. Harter. Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .
[15] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? , 1992, CACM.
[16] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[17] Paul B. Kantor,et al. A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988 .
[18] Joseph W. Janes,et al. Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..
[19] Judith Ann Bateman. Modeling Changes in End-user Relevance Criteria : An Information Seeking Study , 1998 .
[20] S. Hirsh. Children's Relevance Criteria and Information Seeking on Electronic Resources , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[21] Peter G. B. Enser,et al. Progress in Documentation Pictorial Information Retrieval , 1995, J. Documentation.
[22] Caroline Arms. Getting the Picture: Observations from the Library of Congress on Providing Online Access to Pictorial Images. , 1999 .
[23] Carol L. Barry,et al. Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[24] Caroline R. Arms. Historical Collections for the National Digital Library: Lessons andChallenges at the Library of Congress (the first of a two-part story) , 1996 .
[25] B. Dervin,et al. Information needs and uses. , 1986 .
[26] Harry Bruce. A cognitive view of the situational dynamism of user-centered relevance estimation , 1994 .
[27] Alan Trachtenberg,et al. Deconstructing American Photographs@@@Symbols of Ideal Life: Social Documentary Photography in America, 1890-1950@@@Reading American Photographs: Images as History, Mathew Brady to Walker Evans , 1990 .
[28] Caroline Arms,et al. Historical Collections for the National Digital Library: Lessons and Challenges at the Library of Congress [Part II] , 1996, D-Lib Magazine.
[29] D. Case,et al. The Collection and Use of Information by Some American Historians: A Study of Motives and Methods , 1991, The Library Quarterly.
[30] Thomas J. Froehlich,et al. Relevance reconsidered—towards an agenda for the 21st century: introduction to special topic issue on relevance research , 1994 .
[31] Raya Fidel,et al. Challenges in Indexing Electronic Text and Images , 1994 .
[32] Raya Fidel,et al. The image retrieval task: implications for the design and evaluation of image databases , 1997, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..
[33] Carol L. Barry. User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .
[34] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[35] Susanne Ornager. The newspaper image database: empirical supported analysis of users' typology and word association clusters , 1995, SIGIR '95.
[36] Judy Bateman. Modeling the Importance of End-User Relevance Criteria. , 1999 .
[37] John J. Regazzi. Performance measures for information retrieval systems ― an experimental approach , 1988 .
[38] Sandra G. Hirsh. Relevance Determinations in Children's Use of Electronic Resources: A Case Study. , 1998 .
[39] Samantha Kelly Hastings. An exploratory study of intellectual access to digitized art images , 1994 .
[40] Amanda Spink,et al. Image searching on the Excite Web search engine , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..
[41] Peter G. B. Enser. Pictorial information retrieval , 1995 .
[42] Paul Solomon,et al. Toward an Understanding of the Dynamics of Relevance Judgment: An Analysis of One Person's Search Behavior , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[43] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Characteristics of Texts Affecting Relevance Judgments , 1993 .
[44] Stefano Mizzaro. Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .
[45] Susan Siegfried,et al. An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.
[46] Carol L. Barry. Document representations and clues to document relevance , 1998 .
[47] Peiling Wang. A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems , 1994 .
[48] Peter G. B. Enser,et al. Analysis of user need in image archives , 1997, J. Inf. Sci..
[49] Amanda Spink,et al. From Highly Relevant to Not Relevant: Examining Different Regions of Relevance , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[50] Linda Schamber,et al. User Criteria in Relevance Evaluation: Toward Development of a Measurement Scale. , 1996 .
[51] Linda Schamber. Relevance and Information Behavior. , 1994 .
[52] Bert R. Boyce,et al. Beyond topicality : A two stage view of relevance and the retrieval process , 1982, Inf. Process. Manag..
[53] Sara Shatford Layne. Some issues in the indexing of images , 1994 .
[54] T. Park. The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical Study , 1993, The Library Quarterly.