Self-control: teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children.

We investigated a procedure to increase the selection of larger, more delayed reinforcers (i.e., more advantageous in the long run) over smaller immediate reinforcers, in an effort to increase a key aspect of self-control in children. Six preschoolers, including one comparison subject, identified by their teachers as impulsive, were preassessed and found consistently to select smaller immediate reinforcers over larger, more delayed ones. The teaching procedure consisted of gradually increasing the durations of the delay interval over many sessions. The follow-up assessments showed that 5 of these children increased the proportion of their choices of the delayed reinforcers. Before training, indifference points ranged from 1.7 to 51.7 s; following treatment, points rose to a range of 37.5 to at least 90 s, with 3 children preferring the larger reinforcer at all delay intervals tested. The results demonstrated the feasibility of teaching young children to make choices more advantageous to them in the long run.

[1]  Walter Mischel,et al.  The Development of Children’s Knowledge of Self-Control Strategies , 1983 .

[2]  K. I. Coats.  Cognitive Self-Instructional Training Approach for Reducing Disruptive Behavior of Young Children , 1979, Psychological reports.

[3]  J. Barker,et al.  The Effect of Rewards on Intrinsic Interest: Developmental Changes in the Underlying Processes , 1982 .

[4]  J. Yates,et al.  Processes operative during delay of gratification , 1979 .

[5]  David A. Eckerman,et al.  An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. , 1980 .

[6]  R. Quevillon,et al.  The effects of a self-instructional package on overactive preschool boys. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  H. Abikoff,et al.  Hyperactive children treated with stimulants. Is cognitive training a useful adjunct? , 1985, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  R. Herrnstein.  On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  C. B. Ferster.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Masato Ito,et al.  Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  A W Logue,et al.  Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  E. Fantino.  Immediate reward followed by extinction vs. later reward without extinction , 1966 .

[14]  Richard B. Powers,et al.  Choice and self-control in children: A test of Rachlin’s model , 1975 .

[15]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .

[17]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Attention in delay of gratification. , 1970 .

[19]  E. R. Heider.  Information processing and the modification of an "impulsive conceptual tempo". , 1971, Child development.

[20]  V. Douglas,et al.  Assessment of a cognitive training program for hyperactive children , 1976, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[21]  Douglas J. Navarick,et al.  Self-control and choice in humans: Effects of video game playing as a positive reinforcer , 1984 .

[22]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .

[23]  Effects of Age and Self-Verbalization on Children's Ability to Delay Gratification. , 1978 .

[24]  L Green,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control , 2022 .

[25]  E B Ebbesen,et al.  Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[27]  D M Baer,et al.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[28]  A. Neuringer,et al.  Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  A. Logue,et al.  Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  S. O'leary,et al.  Effects of self-instructional training on second- and third-grade hyperactive children: a failure to replicate. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[32]  H. Abikoff.  Efficacy of cognitive training interventions in hyperactive children: A critical review , 1985 .

[33]  Douglas J. Navarick,et al.  Negative reinforcement and choice in humans , 1982 .

[34]  E. Fantino.  Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  A. J. Finch,et al.  Modification of an impulsive cognitive tempo in emotionally disturbed boys , 1975, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[38]  R. Walls,et al.  Development of preference for delayed reinforcement in disadvantaged children. , 1970, Journal of educational psychology.