Specifying Executive Representations and processes in Number Generation Tasks

The Interacting Cognitive Subsystems framework, ICS (Barnard, 1985) proposes that central executive phenomena can be accounted for by two autonomous subsystems, which process different forms of meaning: propositional and schematic (implicational) meanings. The apparent supervisory role of the executive arises from limitations on the exchange of information between these and other cognitive subsystems. This general proposal is elaborated in four experiments in which a total of 1,293 participants are asked to spontaneously generate a large verbal number to varying task constraints, with the intention of specifying the representations of number and task that underlie responses. Responses change systematically according to participants’ use of explicit propositional information provided by the instructions, and inferred implicational information about what the experimenter is requesting. There was a high error rate (between 6% and 24%), participants producing responses that did not fall within the large range indicated by the instructions. The studies support the distinction between propositional and implicational processing in executive function, and provide a framework for understanding normal executive representations and processes.

[1]  E. Poulton Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  An experimental demonstration of factor analysis. , 1948 .

[3]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[4]  C. F. Hockett WHERE THE TONGUE SLIPS, THERE SLIP 1 , 1984 .

[5]  Richard Power,et al.  The dictation of Italian numerals , 1990 .

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. , 1978 .

[8]  P. Barnard,et al.  Interacting cognitive subsystems: A systemic approach to cognitive-affective interaction and change , 1991 .

[9]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Cognitive processes in verbal-number production: inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[11]  J. Towse On random generation and the central executive of working memory. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[12]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The Involvement of the Frontal Lobes in Cognitive Estimation , 1978, Cortex.

[13]  H C Longuet-Higgins,et al.  Learning to count: a computational model of language acquisition , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  E H HSU An experimental demonstration of factor analysis. , 1948, The Journal of general psychology.

[15]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[17]  S. Heywood The Popular Number Seven or Number Preference , 1972 .

[18]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-Modelling Depressive Thought , 1993 .

[19]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Interacting Cognitive Subsystems: Modeling Working Memory Phenomena Within a Multiprocessor Architecture , 1999 .

[20]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[21]  M. Mattson,et al.  From words to meaning: A semantic illusion , 1981 .

[22]  G. Groen,et al.  A chronometric analysis of simple addition. , 1972 .

[23]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .