Coating Formulations for Microneedles

PurposeTo develop a rational basis for designing coating solution formulations for uniform and thick coatings on microneedles and to identify coating strategies to form composite coatings, deliver liquid formulations, and control the mass deposited on microneedles.Materials and MethodsMicroneedles were fabricated using laser-cutting and then dip-coated using different aqueous, organic solvent-based or molten liquid formulations. The mass of riboflavin (vitamin B2) coated onto microneedles was determined as a function of coating and microneedle parameters. Coated microneedles were also inserted into porcine cadaver skin to assess delivery efficacy.ResultsSharp-tipped microneedles, including pocketed microneedles, were fabricated. Excipients that reduced coating solution surface tension improved coating uniformity, while excipients that increased solution viscosity improved coating thickness. Evaluation of more than 20 different coating formulations using FDA approved excipients showed that hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules could be uniformly coated onto microneedles. Model proteins were also uniformly coated on microneedles using the formulations identified in the study. Pocketed microneedles were selectively filled with solid or liquid formulations to deliver difficult-to-coat substances, and composite drug layers were formed for different release profiles. The mass of riboflavin coated onto microneedles increased with its concentration in the coating solution and the number of coating dips and microneedles in the array. Coatings rapidly dissolved in the skin without wiping off on the skin surface.ConclusionsMicroneedles and coating formulations can be designed to have a range of different properties to address different drug delivery scenarios.

[1]  D. F. Evans,et al.  Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering , 1996 .

[2]  L. Scriven Physics and Applications of DIP Coating and Spin Coating , 1988 .

[3]  Mark G. Allen,et al.  Microfabricated needles for transdermal delivery of macromolecules and nanoparticles: Fabrication methods and transport studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Allen,et al.  Microfabricated microneedles: a novel approach to transdermal drug delivery. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  P. Schweizer,et al.  Liquid film coating : scientific principles and their technological implications , 1997 .

[6]  Qi Zhao,et al.  Bacterial adhesion on the metal-polymer composite coatings , 2007 .

[7]  John H. O’haver,et al.  A mathematical model to predict the size of the pellets formed in freeze pelletization techniques: parameters affecting pellet size. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  Kenneth J. Ruschak,et al.  Wetting: Static and Dynamic Contact Lines , 1997 .

[9]  Raymond C Rowe,et al.  Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients , 1994 .

[10]  Diane E. Sutter,et al.  Improved genetic immunization via micromechanical disruption of skin-barrier function and targeted epidermal delivery , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[11]  W. M. Haynes CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1990 .

[12]  J. Matriano,et al.  Macroflux® Microprojection Array Patch Technology: A New and Efficient Approach for Intracutaneous Immunization , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Coated microneedles for transdermal delivery. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  Mahmoud Ameri,et al.  Transdermal delivery of desmopressin using a coated microneedle array patch system. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[15]  M. Cormier,et al.  Transdermal Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides with Microprojection Patch (macroflux®) Technology , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.

[16]  Dorian Liepmann,et al.  Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration , 2005, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[17]  Wijaya Martanto,et al.  Transdermal Delivery of Insulin Using Microneedles in Vivo , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[18]  Michael L. Reed,et al.  Microsystems for drug and gene delivery , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[20]  Vincent J. Sullivan,et al.  Protective immunization against inhalational anthrax: a comparison of minimally invasive delivery platforms. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[21]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  Evaluation of the Barrier Function of Skin Using Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL): A Critical Overview , 2014 .

[22]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[23]  H. Kheshgi The Fate of Thin Liquid Films after Coating , 1997 .

[24]  Regina Luttge,et al.  Silicon micromachined hollow microneedles for transdermal liquid transport , 2003 .

[25]  J Dressman,et al.  Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[26]  V. Stella,et al.  Stability of Drugs and Dosage Forms , 2000, Springer US.

[27]  M. Cormier,et al.  Effect of delivery parameters on immunization to ovalbumin following intracutaneous administration by a coated microneedle array patch system. , 2006, Vaccine.

[28]  D. Barrow,et al.  Microfabricated silicon microneedles for nonviral cutaneous gene delivery , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[29]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.