DEALING WITH SERVICE FAILURES: THE USE OF EXPLANATIONS

This study investigated the impact of four types of explanations following a tourism service failure. Written scenarios were used to orthogonally manipulate explanation type and failure magnitude. Both independent variables had significant effects on customer satisfaction and justice perceptions. Apologies yielded more favorable outcomes than did referential accounts. Specific forms of justice mediated the effects of three explanation types. This research links different explanation types to different forms of justice, thereby shedding light not only on what types of explanations assist most with service recovery, but also on how they have their effects.

[1]  Lisa C. Wan,et al.  Hospitality service failures: Who will be more dissatisfied? , 2007 .

[2]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Providing an Explanation for Service Failure: Context, Content, and Customer Responses , 2007 .

[3]  Hui Liao,et al.  Do it right this time: the role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Anna S. Mattila,et al.  The power of explanations in mitigating the ill‐effects of service failures , 2006 .

[5]  Osman M. Karatepe.  Customer complaints and organizational responses: the effects of complainants' perceptions of justice on satisfaction and loyalty , 2006 .

[6]  James B. Bexley,et al.  Banking customers' varied reactions to service recovery strategies , 2006 .

[7]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure , 2004 .

[8]  Robert Folger,et al.  When Social Accounts Backfire: The Exacerbating Effects of a Polite Message or an Apology on Reactions to an Unfair Outcome1 , 2004 .

[9]  J. Colquitt,et al.  To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Moshe Davidow.  Organizational Responses to Customer Complaints: What Works and What Doesn’t , 2003 .

[11]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery , 2003 .

[12]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Fair process revisited: Differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social comparison information , 2002 .

[13]  Jerome M. Chertkoff,et al.  Explaining Injustice: The Interactive Effect of Explanation and Outcome on Fairness Perceptions and Task Motivation , 2002 .

[14]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  R. Folger,et al.  HRM and service fairness: How being fair with employees spills over to customers , 1999 .

[17]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery , 1999 .

[18]  R. Johnston,et al.  Service Recovery Strategies for Single and Double Deviation Scenarios , 1999 .

[19]  Robert Folger,et al.  Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[20]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution : Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification , 1998 .

[21]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing , 1998 .

[22]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  Service consumption criticality in failure recovery , 1998 .

[23]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior , 1997 .

[24]  William H. Ross,et al.  APPEARANCES DO COUNT: THE EFFECTS OF OUTCOMES AND EXPLANATIONS ON DISPUTANT FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS AND SUPERVISORY EVALUATIONS , 1997 .

[25]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Customer Perceptions of Corporate Responses to Product Complaints: The Role of Explanations , 1996 .

[26]  R. Bies,et al.  Social Accounts in Conflict Situations: Using Explanations to Manage Conflict , 1993 .

[27]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. , 1993 .

[28]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions , 1992 .

[29]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  The Effects of Explanations on Negative Reactions to Deceit. , 1991 .

[30]  Larry L. Cummings,et al.  Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict , 1988 .

[31]  R. Bies,et al.  The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. , 1987 .

[32]  R. Bies.  Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. McNamara,et al.  How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[35]  H. Zeisel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1978 .

[36]  D. R. Bobocel,et al.  How Can Explanations Be Used to Foster Organizational Justice ? , 2022 .