Air microbial contamination in dental clinics: comparison between active and passive methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the microbial air contamination values obtained by active sampling (colony-forming units per cubic metre, CFU/m3) and by passive sampling (Index of microbial air contamination, IMA) and to calculate the corresponding equations. Air sampling was performed in ten dental clinics (DC), before (T0), during (T1) and after (T2) the clinical activity, for five consecutive days, once a month for a period of three months, for a total of 450 air samplings. The correlation was evaluated using the Spearman test, and a p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A statistically significant correlation was found considering both the results obtained from the total observations and from the single sampling times, T0, T1 and T2. Different correlation patterns were observed stratifying by DC. Both methods were able to evaluate the microbial air quality and highlight critical situations; therefore, both can be used with this aim. However, in particular during the activity, passive sampling resulted more sensitive, and for its simplicity, economy and standardization by IMA, as suggested by several authors, can be suggested for routine monitoring.

[1]  Alexandra Stärk Microbiological Environmental Monitoring , 2019, Pharmaceutical Microbiological Quality Assurance and Control.

[2]  C. Pasquarella,et al.  Microbial environmental contamination in Italian dental clinics: A multicenter study yielding recommendations for standardized sampling methods and threshold values. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  J. D. de Soet,et al.  Healthcare-associated viral and bacterial infections in dentistry , 2012, Journal of oral microbiology.

[4]  Paolo Castiglia,et al.  Italian multicentre study on microbial environmental contamination in dental clinics: a pilot study. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  J. Pratten,et al.  Air-borne microbial contamination of surfaces in a UK dental clinic. , 2008, The Journal of general and applied microbiology.

[6]  C. Pasquarella,et al.  Italian multicenter study on infection hazards during dental practice: Control of environmental microbial contamination in public dental surgeries , 2008, BMC public health.

[7]  J. Meurman,et al.  Bacterial aerosols in dental practice – a potential hospital infection problem? , 2006, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[8]  S. Petti,et al.  [Comparison between different methods to monitor the microbial level of indoor air contamination in the dental office]. , 2003, Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita.

[9]  C Pasquarella,et al.  The index of microbial air contamination. , 2000, The Journal of hospital infection.

[10]  Cesira Pasquarella,et al.  [Air microbial sampling: the state of the art]. , 2008, Igiene e sanita pubblica.

[11]  K. Sharon,et al.  Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings: A review of current resources , 2005 .