Quality assessment of auto-stereoscopic rendering depending on positioning accuracy of multi-view capture systems’ components

This paper concerns the quality assessment of the 3D rendering in a production process of auto-stereoscopic images using a multi-view camera with parallel and decentring configuration. The 3D rendering quality problem for such process is related to the coherence of the captured images of different viewpoints. This coherence depends, among others, on a rigorous respect of the shooting and rendering geometries. Assuming perfect rendering conditions, we are rather interested in the shooting geometry and image sensors positioning. This latter must be accurate enough to produce images that are quite coherent with each other and that contribute fully to achieve a quality 3D content. The purpose of this paper is precisely to study the positioning accuracy of the different geometrical parameters of shooting based on a quality assessment of auto-stereoscopic rendering. For the assessment of the 3D rendering quality and in order to determine a positioning accuracy of the different components of the considered multi-view camera, two different approaches are proposed. The first one is based on visual assessment tests of the 3D rendering quality by human observers. The second one is based on the acquired scientific knowledge on human visual acuity. Finally, some simulation and experimental results and their repercussion on the positioning accuracy of the shooting parameters are presented.

[1]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[2]  Eric Dubois A projection method to generate anaglyph stereo images , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[3]  Neil A. Dodgson Analysis of the viewing zone of multiview autostereoscopic displays , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Ken Perlin,et al.  An autostereoscopic display , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Aljoscha Smolic,et al.  View Synthesis for Advanced 3D Video Systems , 2008, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[6]  Graham R Jones,et al.  Controlling perceived depth in stereoscopic images , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[7]  S. Moughamir,et al.  Dynamic adaptation of multi view camera structure , 2010, 2010 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video.

[8]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images , 2008, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[9]  Jessica Prévoteau,et al.  Multiview Shooting Geometry for Multiscopic Rendering with Controlled Distortion , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Multim. Broadcast..

[10]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Subjective evaluation of stereoscopic images: effects of camera parameters and display duration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[11]  M. Sander,et al.  Comparaison de deux échelles logarithmique d'acuité visuelle de loin pour enfant : Rossano et Sander-Zanlonghi , 1999 .

[12]  David F. McAllister,et al.  Producing anaglyphs from synthetic images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Jean-Yves Guillemaut,et al.  Objective Quality Assessment in Free-Viewpoint Video Production , 2008, 2008 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video.

[14]  N. Manamanni,et al.  Towards structurally adaptive multi-view shooting system , 2010, 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED'10.

[15]  Ugur Güdükbay,et al.  Stereoscopic View-Dependent Visualization of Terrain Height Fields , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..