Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.

OBJECTIVE To compare the ability of three modelling approaches to resolve the muscle and joint forces in a lumbar spine model during dynamic sagittal plane lifting. DESIGN Trunk muscle forces, spine compression, and coactivity predicted through double linear optimization, EMG-assisted, and EMG assisted by optimization approaches were compared.Background. The advantages of EMG-based approaches are known from static task analyses. Limited assessment has been made for dynamic lifting. METHODS Eleven male subjects performed sagittal plane lifting-lowering at fixed cadence from 0 degrees to 45 degrees of trunk flexion with and without an external load of 12 kg. Three-dimensional kinematics and dynamics as well as surface EMG provided inputs to a 12 muscle lumbar spine model. RESULTS Trunk muscle coactivity was different between the modelling approaches but spine compression was not. Both EMG-based approaches were sensitive to trunk muscle coactivity and imbalance in left-right muscle forces during sagittal plane lifting. Overall, the best correlations between predicted forces and EMG as well as between forces predicted by different modelling approaches were obtained with the EMG-based models. Only the EMG assisted by optimization approach simultaneously satisfied mechanical and physiological validity. CONCLUSIONS Both EMG-based approaches demonstrated their potential to detect individual trunk muscle strategies. A more detailed trunk anatomy representation would improve the EMG-assisted approach and reduce the adjustment to muscle force gain through EMG assisted by optimization. RELEVANCE Injury to the lumbar spine could command alternative strategies of motion to attenuate pain and damage. To understand these strategies, the ideal lumbar spine model should predict individual muscle force patterns and satisfy mechanical equilibrium.

[1]  A B Schultz,et al.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Richard Evan Hughes,et al.  Empirical evaluation of optimization-based lumbar muscle force prediction models. , 1991 .

[3]  N J Delleman,et al.  Value of biomechanical macromodels as suitable tools for the prevention of work-related low back problems. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of Loads on the Lumbar Spine , 1981, Spine.

[5]  G A Mirka,et al.  The quantification of EMG normalization error. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[6]  J Cholewicki,et al.  EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Christian Larivière,et al.  Comparison between two dynamic methods to estimate triaxial net reaction moments at the L5/S1 joint during lifting. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  R W Norman,et al.  A simple polynomial that predicts low-back compression during complex 3-D tasks. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[9]  S. McGill,et al.  Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of quadratus lumborum during a wide variety of tasks. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  S. McGill.  Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: Implications for lumbar mechanics , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  L Abenhaim,et al.  The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Measurement Properties , 1995, Spine.

[12]  S. McGill,et al.  Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. Bergmark.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[14]  S. McGill.  A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Hellmuth Gretzer.  Swedish Pediatric Orthopedic Society , 1989 .

[17]  R. Norman,et al.  Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[19]  A Schultz,et al.  Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks , 1983, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Darryl Gerard Thelen.  A system identification approach to quantifying lumbar trunk loads. , 1992 .

[22]  D. Gagnon,et al.  The L5/S1 joint moment sensitivity to measurement errors in dynamic 3D multisegment lifting models , 1999 .

[23]  W. Marras,et al.  The Influence of Trunk Muscle Coactivity on Dynamic Spinal Loads , 1995, Spine.

[24]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Development and evaluation of a scalable and deformable geometric model of the human torso. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  Lina Santaguida,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature from T5 to L5 using MRI scans of 15 young males corrected for muscle fibre orientation. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[27]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance , 1997 .

[28]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  M Panjabi,et al.  Validation of mathematical models. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  M. Panjabi.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[32]  J Cholewicki,et al.  Methodological considerations for using inductive sensors (3SPACE ISOTRAK) to monitor 3-D orthopaedic joint motion. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[33]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimization-based spine muscle modeling. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  W S. Marras,et al.  The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  Peter O'Sullivan,et al.  Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine , 1997 .

[36]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  N. Zheng,et al.  An analytical model of the knee for estimation of internal forces during exercise. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  K N An,et al.  Determination of muscle and joint forces: a new technique to solve the indeterminate problem. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[41]  John W. Chow,et al.  Determining the Force-Length-Velocity Relations of the Quadriceps Muscles: II. Maximum Muscle Stress , 1999 .

[42]  Albert B. Schultz,et al.  Models for Analyses of Lumbar Spine Loads , 1990 .

[43]  W. Marras,et al.  A Biomechanical Assessment and Model of Axial Twisting in the Thoracolumbar Spine , 1995, Spine.

[44]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Kinematics and movement sequencing during flexion of the lumbar spine. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[45]  J Cholewicki,et al.  Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  John W. Chow,et al.  Determining the Force-Length-Velocity Relations of the Quadriceps Muscles: I. Anatomical and Geometric Parameters , 1999 .

[47]  Hyeonki Choi,et al.  Comparison of Biomechanical Human Neck Models: Muscle Forces and Spinal Loads at C4/5 Level , 1999 .

[48]  R D Zimmerman.  A review of utilization of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of patients with back pain: The when and what of back pain imaging. , 1997, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[49]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.