Carnivore Translocations and Conservation: Insights from Population Models and Field Data for Fishers (Martes pennanti)

Translocations are frequently used to restore extirpated carnivore populations. Understanding the factors that influence translocation success is important because carnivore translocations can be time consuming, expensive, and controversial. Using population viability software, we modeled reintroductions of the fisher, a candidate for endangered or threatened status in the Pacific states of the US. Our model predicts that the most important factor influencing successful re-establishment of a fisher population is the number of adult females reintroduced (provided some males are also released). Data from 38 translocations of fishers in North America, including 30 reintroductions, 5 augmentations and 3 introductions, show that the number of females released was, indeed, a good predictor of success but that the number of males released, geographic region and proximity of the source population to the release site were also important predictors. The contradiction between model and data regarding males may relate to the assumption in the model that all males are equally good breeders. We hypothesize that many males may need to be released to insure a sufficient number of good breeders are included, probably large males. Seventy-seven percent of reintroductions with known outcomes (success or failure) succeeded; all 5 augmentations succeeded; but none of the 3 introductions succeeded. Reintroductions were instrumental in reestablishing fisher populations within their historical range and expanding the range from its most-contracted state (43% of the historical range) to its current state (68% of the historical range). To increase the likelihood of translocation success, we recommend that managers: 1) release as many fishers as possible, 2) release more females than males (55–60% females) when possible, 3) release as many adults as possible, especially large males, 4) release fishers from a nearby source population, 5) conduct a formal feasibility assessment, and 6) develop a comprehensive implementation plan that includes an active monitoring program.

[1]  K. R. Kramm,et al.  Correlation Between Fisher and Porcupine Abundance in Upper Michigan , 1982 .

[2]  A. Laliberte,et al.  Range Contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates , 2004 .

[3]  R. Powell,et al.  The Fisher, Life History, Ecology and Behavior , 1984 .

[4]  Kimberly S. Heinemeyer.  Temporal dynamics in the movements habitat use activity and spacing of reintroduced fishers in northwestern Montana , 1993 .

[5]  K. Jenkins,et al.  Olympic Fisher Reintroduction Project: 2010 Progress Report , 2009 .

[6]  K. Aubry,et al.  Extirpation and reintroduction of fishers (Martes pennanti) in Oregon: implications for their conservation in the Pacific states , 2003 .

[7]  K. Roy.  Ecology of reintroduced fishers in the Cabinet Mountains of northwest Montana , 1991 .

[8]  T. Ung,et al.  The Status of Fisher (Martes pennanti) at the Northwestern Edge of Their Range: Are They Increasing and Expanding in the Yukon? , 2011 .

[9]  R. Raine.  Winter food habits, responses to snow cover and movements of Fisher (Martes pennanti) and Marten (Martes americana) in southeastern Manitoba , 1981 .

[10]  M. Badry.  FISHER Martes pennanti , 2004 .

[11]  W. Zielinski,et al.  Historical harvest and incidental capture of fishers in California , 1996 .

[12]  Mark W Schwartz,et al.  Predicting extinctions as a result of climate change. , 2006, Ecology.

[13]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. , 2009, Ecology.

[14]  H P Possingham,et al.  Assisted Colonization and Rapid Climate Change , 2008, Science.

[15]  B. Kohn,et al.  The fisher in Wisconsin , 1993 .

[16]  K. McKelvey,et al.  WHEN REINTRODUCTIONS ARE AUGMENTATIONS: THE GENETIC LEGACY OF FISHERS (MARTES PENNANTI) IN MONTANA , 2006 .

[17]  James A. Baker,et al.  Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America , 1987 .

[18]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Vancouver Island Region,et al.  MINISTRY OF WATER, LAND AND AIR PROTECTION , 2002 .

[20]  J. Dutoit.  The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[21]  A. W. Schorger.  Extinct and endangered mammals and birds of the upper Great Lakes region , 1942 .

[22]  C. Pils,et al.  Status of fishers in Wisconsin, 1975 , 1977 .

[23]  Harold E. Broadbooks.  Dalquest, Walter W. Mammals of Washington. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, vol. 2, pp. 1–444, 140 figs., frontis. 1948 , 1948 .

[24]  A. Ruitenberg,et al.  Abstract: Southern New Brunswick compilation and correlation project by the New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy , 1992 .

[25]  P. Seddon,et al.  Directions in reintroduction biology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  J. Lewis,et al.  FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT FOR REINTRODUCING FISHERS TO WASHINGTON , 2004 .

[27]  U. Fish.  Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .

[28]  J. Grinnell,et al.  Fur-Bearing Mammals of California. Their Natural History, Systematic Status, and Relations to Man. , 1938 .

[29]  M. Schwartz.  Ancient DNA Confirms Native Rocky Mountain Fisher (Martes pennanti) Avoided Early 20th Century Extinction , 2007 .

[30]  K. Cullings,et al.  Conservation genetics of the fisher (Martes pennanti) based on mitochondrial DNA sequencing , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[31]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  R. Boone,et al.  Relations among fishers, snow, and martens: development and evaluation of two hypotheses , 1995 .

[33]  J. M. Scott,et al.  Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and Strategy , 1989, Science.

[34]  R. Reading,et al.  Prairie night: black-footed ferrets and the recovery of endangered species , 1998 .

[35]  V. Bailey,et al.  The Mammals and Life Zones of Oregon. , 1937 .

[36]  R. Weir,et al.  Factors Affecting Landscape Occupancy by Fishers in North-Central British Columbia , 2010 .

[37]  M. Sandell,et al.  Seasonal changes in the social organization of male stoats, Mustela erminea: an effect of shifts between two decisive resources , 1986 .

[38]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Genetic variation and structure of fisher (Martes pennanti) populations across North America , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[39]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[40]  J. Birks,et al.  World Distribution and Status of the Genus Martes in 2000 , 2005 .

[41]  L. Campbell,et al.  Historical and contemporary distributions of carnivores in forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2005 .

[42]  Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution , 1989 .

[43]  W. Newsom.  Mammals on Anticosti Island , 1937 .

[44]  Angela K. Fuller,et al.  Martens and Fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments : an international perspective , 2004 .

[45]  R. Weir.  DIET, SPATIAL ORGANIZATION, AND HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF FISHERS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1995 .

[46]  K. Ralls,et al.  Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review , 1999 .

[47]  R. Powell,et al.  Effects of body size on male mating tactics and paternity in black bears, Ursus americanus , 2003 .

[48]  KEVIN S. MCKELVEY,et al.  Distribution and Broadscale Habitat Relations of the Wolverine in the Contiguous United States , 2007 .

[49]  M. Schwartz,et al.  A Framework for Debate of Assisted Migration in an Era of Climate Change , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[50]  L. Donald,et al.  of the INTERIOR , 1962 .

[51]  P. L. Wright,et al.  Results of Transplanting Fishers in Montana , 1968 .