Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.

Deaf and hearing individuals who either used sign language (signers) or not (nonsigners) were tested on visual memory for objects and shapes that were difficult to describe verbally with a same/different matching paradigm. The use of 4 groups was designed to permit a separation of effects related to sign language use (signers vs. nonsigners) and effects related to auditory deprivation (deaf vs. hearing). Forty deaf native signers and nonsigners and 51 hearing signers and nonsigners participated in the study. Signing individuals (both deaf and hearing) were more accurate than nonsigning individuals (deaf and hearing) at memorizing shapes. For the shape memory task but not the object task, deaf signers and nonsigners displayed right hemisphere (RH) advantage over the left hemisphere (LH). Conversely, both hearing groups displayed a memory advantage for shapes in the LH over the RH. Results indicate that enhanced memory performance for shapes in signers (deaf and hearing) stems from the visual skills acquired through sign language use and that deafness, irrespective of language background, leads to the use of a visually based strategy for memory of difficult-to-describe items.

[1]  John Clibbens,et al.  Atypical lateralization of memory for location: Effects of deafness and sign language use , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[3]  C. Hutton,et al.  Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Paul Arnold,et al.  Memory for Faces and Objects by Deaf and Hearing Signers and Hearing Nonsigners , 1998 .

[5]  Ila Parasnis,et al.  Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  L. E. Krueger.  A Theory of Perceptual Matching , 1978 .

[7]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[8]  Karen R. Dobkins,et al.  Left-Hemisphere Dominance for Motion Processing in Deaf Signers , 1999 .

[9]  Patricia Siple,et al.  Understanding language through sign language research , 1978 .

[10]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[11]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[12]  H. Spinnler,et al.  Does the hemisphere stimulated play a specific role in delayed recognition of complex abstract patterns? A tachistoscopic study , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  H. L. Dee,et al.  Cerebral dominance and lateral differences in perception and memory. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  J B Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry for visual information processing. , 1996, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[15]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Visual Attention after Early Deafness , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  H. Lane,et al.  Cerebral asymmetry in the perception of American Sign Language , 1979, Brain and Language.

[17]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Enhanced Image Generation Abilities in Deaf Signers: A Right Hemisphere Effect , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  H. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language , 1987, Brain Research.

[19]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Activation of human prefrontal cortex during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks measured by functional MRI. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  K. Emmorey.  Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights From Sign Language Research , 2001 .

[21]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  S. Palmer.  Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  R. Markman,et al.  Lateral cerebral differences in the deaf in response to linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli , 1977, Brain and Language.

[25]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers , 1993, Cognition.

[26]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. , 1981 .

[27]  Craig J. Brozinsky,et al.  Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .