How oversight improves member-maintained communities

Online communities need regular maintenance activities such as moderation and data input, tasks that typically fall to community owners. Communities that allow all members to participate in maintenance tasks have the potential to be more robust and valuable. A key challenge in creating member-maintained communities is building interfaces, algorithms, and social structures that encourage people to provide high-quality contributions. We use Karau and Williams' collective effort model to predict how peer and expert editorial oversight affect members' contributions to a movie recommendation website and test these predictions in a field experiment with 87 contributors. Oversight increased both the quantity and quality of contributions while reducing antisocial behavior, and peers were as effective at oversight as experts. We draw design guidelines and suggest avenues for future work from our results.

[1]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[2]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[3]  N. Kerr Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[4]  S. Harkins Social Loafing and Social Facilitation , 1987 .

[5]  Jean Lave,et al.  Situating learning in communities of practice , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[6]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[7]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[8]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[9]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble” , 1999, CHI '99.

[10]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[11]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[12]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  Marc Smith,et al.  Tools for navigating large social cyberspaces , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems , 2002, IUI '02.

[15]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[16]  A. Graycar Graffiti: Implications for law enforcement, local government and the community , 2003 .

[17]  John Riedl,et al.  Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[19]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[21]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space , 2004, CHI.