The Thickness of Musical Pitch

Do people who speak different languages think differently, even when they are not using language? To find out, we used nonlinguistic psychophysical tasks to compare mental representations of musical pitch in native speakers of Dutch and Farsi. Dutch speakers describe pitches as high (hoog) or low (laag), whereas Farsi speakers describe pitches as thin (na-zok) or thick (koloft). Differences in language were reflected in differences in performance on two pitch-reproduction tasks, even though the tasks used simple, nonlinguistic stimuli and responses. To test whether experience using language influences mental representations of pitch, we trained native Dutch speakers to describe pitch in terms of thickness, as Farsi speakers do. After the training, Dutch speakers’ performance on a nonlinguistic psychophysical task resembled the performance of native Farsi speakers. People who use different linguistic space-pitch metaphors also think about pitch differently. Language can play a causal role in shaping nonlinguistic representations of musical pitch.

[1]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[2]  Sandy Lovie How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[3]  Mark Johnson,et al.  The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Ellen Winner,et al.  "Metaphorical" Mapping in Human Infants , 1981 .

[5]  R. Stone,et al.  Toward a Kpelle Conceptualization of Music Performance , 1981 .

[6]  R. Miller The Structure of Singing: System and Art in Vocal Technique , 1986 .

[7]  D. Slobin Thinking for Speaking , 1987 .

[8]  D. Slobin From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[9]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[11]  D. Gentner,et al.  Metaphor and knowledge change , 2000 .

[12]  L. Boroditsky Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Motion events in language and cognition , 2002, Cognition.

[14]  Richard D Ashley,et al.  MUSICAL PITCH SPACE ACROSS MODALITIES: SPATIAL AND OTHER MAPPINGS THROUGH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE , 2004 .

[15]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[16]  K. Douglas,et al.  Amusia is associated with deficits in spatial processing , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Morais,et al.  Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought , 2008 .

[20]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts , 2010 .

[22]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Space for thinking , 2009 .

[23]  Renee Timmers,et al.  Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  The Amusic Brain: Lost in Music, but Not in Space , 2010, PloS one.

[25]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Can Mirror-Reading Reverse the Flow of Time? , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[26]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Preverbal Infants’ Sensitivity to Synaesthetic Cross-Modality Correspondences , 2010, Psychological science.

[27]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Shakila Shayan,et al.  Reprints Available Directly from the Publishers Photocopying Permitted by License Only the Thickness of Pitch: Crossmodal Metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec , 2022 .

[29]  G. Lupyan Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[30]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  The Sound of Thickness: Prelinguistic Infants' Associations of Space and Pitch , 2012, CogSci.

[31]  Asifa Majid,et al.  Spatial metaphor in language can promote the development of cross-modal mappings in children. , 2014, Developmental science.