Age- and Tumor Subtype-Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers.

PURPOSE CHEK2*1100delC is a well-established breast cancer risk variant that is most prevalent in European populations; however, there are limited data on risk of breast cancer by age and tumor subtype, which limits its usefulness in breast cancer risk prediction. We aimed to generate tumor subtype- and age-specific risk estimates by using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 44,777 patients with breast cancer and 42,997 controls from 33 studies genotyped for CHEK2*1100delC. PATIENTS AND METHODS CHEK2*1100delC genotyping was mostly done by a custom Taqman assay. Breast cancer odds ratios (ORs) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers versus noncarriers were estimated by using logistic regression and adjusted for study (categorical) and age. Main analyses included patients with invasive breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies. RESULTS Proportions of heterozygous CHEK2*1100delC carriers in controls, in patients with breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies, and in patients with breast cancer from familial- and clinical genetics center-based studies were 0.5%, 1.3%, and 3.0%, respectively. The estimated OR for invasive breast cancer was 2.26 (95%CI, 1.90 to 2.69; P = 2.3 × 10(-20)). The OR was higher for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease (2.55 [95%CI, 2.10 to 3.10; P = 4.9 × 10(-21)]) than it was for ER-negative disease (1.32 [95%CI, 0.93 to 1.88; P = .12]; P interaction = 9.9 × 10(-4)). The OR significantly declined with attained age for breast cancer overall (P = .001) and for ER-positive tumors (P = .001). Estimated cumulative risks for development of ER-positive and ER-negative tumors by age 80 in CHEK2*1100delC carriers were 20% and 3%, respectively, compared with 9% and 2%, respectively, in the general population of the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION These CHEK2*1100delC breast cancer risk estimates provide a basis for incorporating CHEK2*1100delC into breast cancer risk prediction models and into guidelines for intensified screening and follow-up.

Michael Jones | Julian Peto | Thomas Brüning | Kamila Czene | Alfons Meindl | Thilo Dörk | Barbara Burwinkel | Arto Mannermaa | Annegien Broeks | Henrik Flyger | John L Hopper | Hermann Brenner | Kenneth Offit | Caroline Seynaeve | Per Hall | Manjeet K Bolla | Heli Nevanlinna | Irene L Andrulis | Angela Cox | Peter A Fasching | Annika Lindblom | Georgia Chenevix-Trench | Anthony Swerdlow | Vessela Kristensen | Julia A Knight | Simon S Cross | Volker Arndt | Argyrios Ziogas | Ian Tomlinson | Roger L Milne | Olivia Fletcher | Sten Cornelissen | Anja Rudolph | Qin Wang | Alison M Dunning | Hoda Anton-Culver | Anna Jakubowska | Jan Lubinski | Hiltrud Brauch | Maartje Hooning | Montserrat García-Closas | Graham G Giles | Jenny Chang-Claude | Paul D P Pharoah | Fergus J Couch | Jonine Figueroa | Douglas F Easton | Mark Robson | Veli-Matti Kosma | Alice S Whittemore | Peter Hillemanns | Mieke Schutte | Melissa C Southey | Antoinette Hollestelle | Quinten Waisfisz | Amy Trentham-Dietz | Rita K Schmutzler | Celine Vachon | A. Whittemore | S. Cross | P. Fasching | C. Vachon | K. Czene | P. Hall | F. Couch | H. Brenner | J. Chang-Claude | M. García-Closas | G. Giles | J. Hopper | E. John | A. Spurdle | T. Dörk | M. Southey | A. Cox | D. Easton | A. Hollestelle | A. Broeks | P. Pharoah | J. Peto | E. Khusnutdinova | K. Offit | A. Antoniou | H. Brauch | M. Schutte | V. Kristensen | P. Hillemanns | A. Ziogas | H. Anton-Culver | A. Dunning | O. Fletcher | G. Chenevix-Trench | S. Bojesen | H. Nevanlinna | N. Bogdanova | R. Tollenaar | R. Milne | A. Mannermaa | V. Kosma | A. Lindblom | M. Schmidt | M. Bolla | Qin Wang | Andrew Lee | T. Muranen | Q. Waisfisz | M. Adank | A. Meindl | R. Schmutzler | H. Flyger | A. Rudolph | B. Burwinkel | E. Sawyer | I. Tomlinson | I. Andrulis | J. Knight | S. Margolin | M. Hooning | L. Haeberle | V. Arndt | A. Swerdlow | J. Figueroa | T. Brüning | C. Seynaeve | A. Jakubowska | J. Lubiński | N. Antonenkova | A. Trentham-Dietz | P. Newcomb | M. Bermisheva | T. Park-Simon | A. V. D. van den Ouweland | M. Robson | F. Hogervorst | S. Cornelissen | L. van der Kolk | H. Surowy | Amanda B Spurdle | Sara Margolin | Rob A E M Tollenaar | Antonis C Antoniou | Marjanka K Schmidt | Polly A Newcomb | Elinor J Sawyer | Elza Khusnutdinova | Esther M John | Lothar Haeberle | Ans van den Ouweland | Marina Bermisheva | Andrew Lee | Tjoung-Won Park-Simon | Harald Surowy | Taru A Muranen | Natalia V Bogdanova | Natalia N Antonenkova | E. Galle | Lizet van der Kolk | Stig Bojesen | Muriel A Adank | Frans Hogervorst | Richard van Hien | Hanne Meijers | Eva Galle | Julie Soens | A. Lee | J. Soens | H. Meijers | R. van Hien | Michael P. Jones | P. Hall

[1]  The Polish Breast Cancer Consortium Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2*1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations , 2002 .

[2]  D. Clayton,et al.  Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. , 1987, Biometrics.

[3]  J. Martens,et al.  Excess breast cancer risk in first degree relatives of CHEK2∗1100delC positive familial breast cancer cases. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[4]  P. Devilee,et al.  Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation , 2000, The Lancet.

[5]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[6]  前田 邦彦,et al.  山形県の乳癌の病理学的特性-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)の発現率に関する調査- , 2010 .

[7]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Family History, Genetic Testing, and Clinical Risk Prediction: Pooled Analysis of CHEK2*1100delC in 1,828 Bilateral Breast Cancers and 7,030 Controls , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[8]  S. Bojesen,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC genotyping for clinical assessment of breast cancer risk: meta-analyses of 26,000 patient cases and 27,000 controls. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Horsman,et al.  Frequency of the CHEK2 1100delC mutation among women with breast cancer: an international study. , 2008, Cancer research.

[10]  M. Schutte,et al.  Tumour characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients carrying the germline CHEK2*1100delC variant , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[11]  D. Easton,et al.  BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity is associated with a high breast cancer risk in women , 2011, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[13]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  T. Dörk,et al.  Breast cancer in patients carrying a germ-line CHEK2 mutation: Outcome after breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  J. Peterse,et al.  Breast cancer survival and tumor characteristics in premenopausal women carrying the CHEK2*1100delC germline mutation. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Ang,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC screening of Asian women with a family history of breast cancer is unwarranted. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Variants in CHEK2 other than 1100delC do not make a major contribution to breast cancer susceptibility. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[19]  T. Hupp,et al.  The regulation of CHK2 in human cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[20]  Jane E. Carpenter,et al.  Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants , 2015, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  S. Cross,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples: Opt out system for patients is optimal and endorsed in many countries , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  A. Jakubowska,et al.  CHEK2-Positive Breast Cancers in Young Polish Women , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[25]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  L. Kuller Breast cancer study. , 1988, Science.

[27]  J. Foekens,et al.  Gene expression profiling assigns CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers to the luminal intrinsic subtypes , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  Y Taya,et al.  The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites. , 2000, Genes & development.