Mapping project dialogues using IBIS: a case study and some reflections

Purpose – The purpose of this practice note is to describe the use of the issue‐based information system (IBIS) notation to map dialogues that occur in project meetings.Design/methodology/approach – A case study is used to illustrate how the technique works. A discussion highlighting the key features, benefits and limitations of the method is also presented along with a comparison of IBIS to other similar notations.Findings – IBIS is seen to help groups focus on the issues at hand, bypassing or avoiding personal agendas, personality clashes and politics.Practical implications – The technique can help improve the quality of communication in projects meetings. The case study highlights how the notation can assist project teams in developing a consensus on contentious issues in a structured yet flexible way.Originality/value – IBIS has not been widely used in project management. This note illustrates its value in helping diverse stakeholders get to a shared understanding of the issues being discussed and a s...

[1]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Simone Stumpf.  Argumentation-based design rationale - the sharpest tools in the box , 1997 .

[3]  T. Gelder.  Argument Mapping with Reason ! Able , 2002 .

[4]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[5]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[6]  K. Samset,et al.  Issues in Front-End Decision Making on Projects , 2010 .

[7]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[8]  Hugh Dubberly,et al.  Why Horst W. J. Rittel Matters , 2007, Design Issues.

[9]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  THE PRACTICE LEVEL IN PARTICIPATORY DESIGN RATIONALE: STUDYING PRACTITIONER MOVES AND CHOICES , 2010 .

[11]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC , 2005 .

[12]  T. Gelder,et al.  Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Mapping , 2002 .

[13]  Jintae Lee.  Decision Representation Language (DRL) and Its Support Environment , 1989 .

[14]  Kenneth H. Rose,et al.  Book Review: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Fourth Edition , 2001 .

[15]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Capturing and Representing Deliberation in Participatory Planning Practices , 2010 .

[16]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .