Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy

Hip arthroplasty (HA) is a frequently used procedure with high success rates, but 7% to 27% of the patients complain of persistent postsurgical pain 1 to 4 years post-operation. HA complications depend on the post-operative delay, the type of material used, the patient’s characteristics, and the surgical approach. Radiographs are still the first imaging modality used for routine follow-up, in asymptomatic and painful cases. CT and MRI used to suffer from metallic artifacts but are nowadays central in HA complications diagnosis, both having their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging workup for HA complication diagnosis, which may have an impact on patient management. After a brief reminder about the different types of prostheses, this article reviews their normal and pathologic appearance, according to each imaging modality, keeping in mind that few abnormalities might be present, not anyone requiring treatment, depending on the clinical scenario. A diagnostic imaging workup is also discussed, to aid the therapist in his imaging studies prescription and the radiologist in their practical aspects.

[1]  N. Hailer,et al.  The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture. , 2022, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  M. Rickman,et al.  Outcomes analysis of anterior and lateral approach for open repair of hip abductor tendons. , 2022, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[3]  E. van der Heide,et al.  Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle , 2022, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[4]  Kevin Kwan,et al.  The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length? , 2022, Arthroplasty today.

[5]  Jaeho Kim,et al.  The Comparison of Lower Extremity Length and Angle between Computed Radiography-Based Teleoroentgenogram and EOS® Imaging System , 2022, Diagnostics.

[6]  S. Paul,et al.  Comparison of functional outcomes and complications of cemented vs uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the elderly neck of femur fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2022, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[7]  M. Karaglani,et al.  MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study , 2022, Cureus.

[8]  Jun-Ying Sun,et al.  A multi-center retrospective comparative study of third generation Ceramic-on- Ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 45 years with or without the sandwich liner: A ten-year minimum , 2022, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[9]  Sungjin Park,et al.  The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up , 2021, Hip & pelvis.

[10]  James F McDonald,et al.  An Enhanced Understanding of Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Next-Generation Sequencing , 2019, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  A. Mansour,et al.  Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[12]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  MRI findings of ischiofemoral impingement after total hip arthroplasty are associated with increased femoral antetorsion , 2021, Acta radiologica.

[13]  J. Lazennec,et al.  How much change in pelvic sagittal tilt can result in hip dislocation due to prosthetic impingement? A computer simulation study , 2021, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  M. Hepinstall,et al.  Impact of Acetabular Implant Design on Aseptic Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2021, Arthroplasty today.

[15]  J. Petscavage-Thomas,et al.  Best Practices: Best Imaging Modality for Surveillance of Metal-On-Metal Hip Arthroplasty. , 2020, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  C. Castelli,et al.  15-year follow-up of MoM 36-mm THA: clinical, laboratory, and radiological (CT and MRI) prospective assessment , 2020, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[17]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Prospective and longitudinal evolution of postoperative periprosthetic findings on metal artifact–reduced MR imaging in asymptomatic patients after uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 2020, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  K. Koch,et al.  Heating of Hip Arthroplasty Implants During Metal Artifact Reduction MRI at 1.5- and 3.0-T Field Strengths. , 2020, Investigative radiology.

[19]  M. Louis,et al.  3D reconstructions, 4D imaging and postprocessing with CT in musculoskeletal disorders: Past, present and future. , 2020, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[20]  M. Geijer,et al.  Pre- and postoperative offset and femoral neck version measurements and validation using 3D computed tomography in total hip arthroplasty , 2020, Acta radiologica open.

[21]  J. Barfett,et al.  The Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Technique on Postoperative Muscle Atrophy. , 2020, Orthopedics.

[22]  F. Simeone,et al.  MARS MRI assessment of fatty degeneration of the gluteal muscles in patients with THA: reliability and accuracy of commonly used classification systems , 2020, Skeletal Radiology.

[23]  B. Haller,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI with metal artifact reduction for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[24]  L. Sconfienza,et al.  Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty: Diagnostic Performance of Conventional MRI Features and Locoregional Lymphadenopathy to Identify Infected Implants , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  J. Lazennec,et al.  Sagittal Spinopelvic Translation Is Combined With Pelvic Tilt During the Standing to Sitting Position: Pelvic Incidence Is a Key Factor in Patients Who Underwent THA , 2020, Arthroplasty today.

[26]  D. Dennis,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Patients With a Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  A. Alavi,et al.  The Role of Imaging Techniques to Define a Peri-Prosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infection: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statements , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  David R. Maldonado,et al.  Asymptomatic Gluteal Tendinopathies Negatively Impact Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  Yixin Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of peri-prosthetic radiolucent lines surrounding the cementless femoral stem using digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction: a cadaveric study in comparison with radiography and computed tomography. , 2020, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[30]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Impact of stem design and cementation on postoperative femoral antetorsion in 227 patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) , 2020, Skeletal Radiology.

[31]  Young-Min Kwon,et al.  MARS MRI Characteristics of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene THA Differ From Metal-On-Metal THA. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  S. Chevret,et al.  How is quality of life after total hip replacement related to the reconstructed anatomy? A study with low-dose stereoradiography. , 2020, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[33]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection Using MRI with Metal Artifact Reduction at 1.5 T. , 2020, Radiology.

[34]  Lauren N. Pearson,et al.  Letter to the Editor on "The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria". , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[35]  R. Jenkinson,et al.  Association Between Surgical Approach and Major Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2020, JAMA.

[36]  J. Henckel,et al.  Uncemented femoral stem orientation and position in total hip arthroplasty: A CT study , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[37]  A. Lindblad,et al.  Persistent , 2020, Definitions.

[38]  C. Phan,et al.  L’imagerie des prothèses de hanche : complications communes et spécifiques des différents couples de frottements , 2020 .

[39]  H. Rüdiger,et al.  MRI with state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction after total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients , 2019, European Radiology.

[40]  H. Potter,et al.  MRI of Hip Arthroplasties: Comparison of Isotropic Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Selective (MAVRIC SL) Acquisitions With a Conventional MAVRIC SL Acquisition. , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  S. Jerabek,et al.  Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Advanced Imaging and Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques: A Case Series , 2019, HSS Journal ®.

[42]  Paul N. Smith,et al.  Identification and differentiation of gluteus medius tendon pathology using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2019, Musculoskeletal science & practice.

[43]  I. Omar,et al.  Imaging of Hip Arthroplasties: Normal Findings and Hardware Complications , 2019, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[44]  W. Xu,et al.  Surgical injury and repair of hip external rotators in THA via posterior approach: a three-dimensional MRI-evident quantitative prospective study , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[45]  T. Wright,et al.  MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions: A Cross-sectional Study , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[46]  N. Giori CORR Insights®: MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions A Cross-sectional Study , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  H. Malchau,et al.  What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  M. Beck,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful total hip arthroplasty: a comparative multiinstitutional analysis. , 2019, The British journal of radiology.

[49]  Benjamin Fritz,et al.  Improved Visualization of Juxtaprosthetic Tissue Using Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Experimental and Clinical Optimization of Compressed Sensing SEMAC , 2019, Investigative radiology.

[50]  G. Materazzi,et al.  MRI findings, metal ion levels and clinical outcome of a complete series of large metal on metal THA: what’s really going on? , 2018, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[51]  M. Louis,et al.  Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening , 2018, European Radiology.

[52]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  SPECT/CT in Postoperative Painful Hip Arthroplasty. , 2018, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[53]  Young-Min Kwon,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Metal Ion Level in Predicting Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Due to Head-Neck Taper Corrosion in Primary Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[54]  R. Meneghini Investigation of the Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[55]  J. Parvizi,et al.  The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[56]  A. Obut,et al.  Assessment of hip abductors by MRI after total hip arthroplasty and effect of fatty atrophy on functional outcome , 2018, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[57]  R. Wolterbeek,et al.  Pseudotumor in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a comparison study of three grading systems with MRI , 2018, Skeletal Radiology.

[58]  D. Murray,et al.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[59]  F. Canovas,et al.  Global radiological score for femoral cementless revision stem , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[60]  J. Fritz,et al.  Advanced MR Imaging after Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Clinical Impact , 2017, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[61]  M. Nittka,et al.  Leaps in Technology: Advanced MR Imaging after Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2017, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[62]  Matthew F Koff,et al.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[63]  H. Potter,et al.  Advanced MRI Techniques for the Hip Joint: Focus on the Postoperative Hip. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[64]  J. Lazennec,et al.  What is the Impact of a Spinal Fusion on Acetabular Implant Orientation in Functional Standing and Sitting Positions? , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[65]  G. Flivik,et al.  Is a hollow centralizer necessary when using a polished, tapered, cemented femoral stem? , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[66]  William A. Leone,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Metal Ion Levels in Predicting "Pseudotumors" due to Taper Corrosion in Patients With Dual Taper Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[67]  T. Sculco,et al.  Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review , 2017, Arthroplasty today.

[68]  H. Tsuchiya,et al.  Periprosthetic Occult Fractures of the Acetabulum Occur Frequently During Primary THA , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[69]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  MR imaging of soft tissue alterations after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of classic surgical approaches , 2017, European Radiology.

[70]  J. Mandell,et al.  Iliopsoas bursal extension of lipohemarthrosis: A novel imaging finding associated with hip fracture , 2017, Skeletal Radiology.

[71]  S. Avasarala,et al.  Bilateral Lower-Extremity Edema Caused by Iliopsoas Bursal Distention after Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[72]  I. Pressney,et al.  Imaging of the Painful Hip Arthroplasty , 2016, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[73]  K. Chiu,et al.  A review of the clinical approach to persistent pain following total hip replacement. , 2016, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[74]  A. Freiberg,et al.  Asymptomatic Pseudotumors in Patients with Taper Corrosion of a Dual-Taper Modular Femoral Stem: MARS-MRI and Metal Ion Study. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[75]  Carolyn Anglin,et al.  Good vs Poor Results After Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis Method Using Implant and Anatomic Parameters With the EOS Imaging System. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[76]  T. Renkawitz,et al.  Leg length and offset differences above 5mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[77]  D. Molè,et al.  Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: A diagnostic algorithm. , 2016, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[78]  A. Malkani,et al.  Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[79]  V. Zdravkovic,et al.  Osteolytic changes around biodegradable cement restrictors in hip surgery , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[80]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review , 2016, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[81]  F. Canovas,et al.  Assessment of fixation in cementless femoral revision of total hip arthroplasty: comparison of the Engh score versus radiolucent line measurement , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[82]  S. Milz,et al.  Importance of a distal centralizer in experimental malpositioning of cemented stems. A biomechanical study on human femora , 2015, Archives of medical science : AMS.

[83]  R. Schwarzkopf,et al.  The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[84]  I. Clarke,et al.  Total Hip Prostheses in Standing, Sitting and Squatting Positions: An Overview of Our 8 Years Practice Using the EOS Imaging Technology , 2015, The open orthopaedics journal.

[85]  A. Burge Total Hip Arthroplasty: MR Imaging of Complications Unrelated to Metal Wear , 2015, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[86]  H. Potter,et al.  MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[87]  M. Nittka,et al.  MR imaging with metal artifact-reducing sequences and gadolinium contrast agent in a case-control study of periprosthetic abnormalities in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[88]  Hollis G Potter,et al.  What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Imaging Modalities to Diagnose Wear-related Corrosion Problems? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[89]  H. Potter,et al.  MRI Predicts ALVAL and Tissue Damage in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[90]  M. Rousseau,et al.  Lumbar-pelvic-femoral balance on sitting and standing lateral radiographs. , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[91]  Hyojeong Mulcahy,et al.  Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: part 2, revisions and complications. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[92]  Hyojeong Mulcahy,et al.  Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: part 1, features and radiographic assessment. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[93]  Johann Henckel,et al.  Pseudotumors Are Common in Well-positioned Low-wearing Metal-on-Metal Hips , 2012, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[94]  Kenneth A Buckwalter,et al.  CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications. , 2012, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[95]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients , 2012, BMJ Open.

[96]  H. Gill,et al.  A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[97]  C. Maynou,et al.  Taux de fracture des inserts de céramique « sandwich » dans un cotyle ATLAS III™ : étude de 144 prothèses totales de hanche de première intention à 74 mois de recul , 2011 .

[98]  H. Migaud,et al.  Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup. , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[99]  M. Agreiter,et al.  Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[100]  Paul Dieppe,et al.  Persistent pain after joint replacement: Prevalence, sensory qualities, and postoperative determinants , 2011, PAIN®.

[101]  N. Sans,et al.  [Imaging of total hip arthroplasty: normal and pathological imaging features, role of ultrasound, CT and MRI]. , 2011, Journal de radiologie.

[102]  A. Toms,et al.  Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[103]  H. Gill,et al.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings—a radiological perspective , 2011, European Radiology.

[104]  P. Campbell,et al.  Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[105]  D. Beverland,et al.  Perception of Imposed Leg Length Inequality in Normal Subjects , 2010, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[106]  A. Davies,et al.  Hip arthroplasty. Part 1: prosthesis terminology and classification. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[107]  A. Davies,et al.  Hip arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[108]  R Philippot,et al.  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. , 2009, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[109]  Kenneth A Buckwalter,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients with bone deficiency of the acetabulum. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[110]  R. Scholz,et al.  Kurzschäfte in der Hüftendoprothetik , 2007, Der Orthopäde.

[111]  L. Beaupre,et al.  Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 1: Infection resolution. , 2007, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[112]  R. Scholz,et al.  [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty]. , 2007, Der Orthopade.

[113]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[114]  Claudio Dora,et al.  Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. , 2005, Radiology.

[115]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[116]  G. Anastopoulos,et al.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the elderly , 1999, International Orthopaedics.

[117]  R. Gustilo,et al.  Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Study of the Treatment of One Hundred and Six Infections* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[118]  R. Barrack,et al.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[119]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[120]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[121]  R. Poss,et al.  Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.